15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHow long for Service?
Leading reported evidence
Check $361
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
$500 dollar deductable so insurance sent me a check for $361.
Leading evidence: 'Check $361' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check $361' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello
I just sent my '03 996 in for service to Porsche North Scottdale in Phoenix AZ....hissing from the right from radiator (like it was trying to die!)
they said it would be a week before they could look at it!
is that normal ?
any other Phonecians out there have that experience.
i mean for the kind of coin i plunk down monthly for that thing you'd think they could step it up a bit!
anything i can do to get them moving along?
thanks
Jason
I was there two weeks ago to buy a C4S. Worst attitude of any Porsche dealer I've dealt with. Penske should be ashamed of himself.
I bought one in Nevada instead.
Strange, I have been in there several times for minor stuff and never really had to wait. The service was good and polite. It never seemed that busy in the shop which is open to the public. The service advisor I deal with is Dave.
I can't speak on the sales dept. as I did not buy my car there. I'd like to know more about that in case I need a new car one day.
fyi
porsche north scottsdale has seen and diagnosed my car!
they say it is a busted condensor? yadayadayada 800 bucks to replace!
not covered under warranty
they speculate that a rock jumped up and busted it
anybody else have this happen?
It's possible, I guess. But I never heard of anybody else with that problem.
If a rock hit it, and you were driving, would you not be able to hear/feel it?
I have a novel idea; get a flashlight, look at the condenser and see for yourself if there is road-debris caused damage, if there is then it's not warranty. Hey, that was simple, now wasn't it? Don't forget, warranty is paid by PCNA, if the claim is rejected the dealer takes the loss.
At the moment ALL manufacturers are tightening up on warranty so the days of marginal claims have ended. This is obviously causing a problem to the dealers which is why they expect you to buy a new car before the warranty has expired, because they don't actually want to present any customers with repairs invoices other than service work......
I had stone damage to an a/c condensor years ago on a different car that required replacement of the condensor. It's definitely possible to get damaged by road debris, just unlucky. I doubt you would notice it while driving. It's certainly not a warranty issue any more than stone chips or wheel rash would be.
I don't think it should have taken them a week to take a look at it though.
C.
ok what ended up happening is porsche got the car back to me in 5 days
the cost was $861
warranty did not cover it but my comprehensive insuracne did!
$500 dollar deductable so insurance sent me a check for $361.
porsche showed me both the condesor and the rock!
Why in the world would you make a claim for $361 on your insurance. Trust me, this one will come back to bite you in the butt. Seen friends lose coverage or get rates jacked up for that kinda stuff. You have to pick your battles with the insurance industry. Just my $.02
LVDell
thanks for your reply
actually it was a comprehensive claim....my understanding is that such claims do nothing to your rates.
at least that is what my insurer told me
if it were a collision claim that would be different
Jason
I do not want to speak for your insurer but I got "reviewed" with USAA after 2 claims under COMP coverage (car broken into 2 times). Not very big claims (i.e., stereo, etc.) but then the new premium came up for renewal..........OUCH! I ended up paying more than before and would have covered my claim in a couple years. Needless to say I switched to GEICO and saved a bundle (I know that sounds to much like a TV commercial)
Anyway, I am on you r side here and hope it does nothing to your rates. I just think the insurance guy is feeding you a bunch of crap to get more in premiums (justified) further down the road. I am sure it is one crooked business!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.