12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGruppe2? Any experience?
Leading reported evidence
Check mashaw and they don;t show a taco style wing
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I have checked MAshaw and they don;t show a taco style wing.
Leading evidence: 'Check mashaw and they don;t show a taco style wing' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check ma shaw' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Personally outside of OEM, I would first check MA Shaw to see if they make a mk1 taco, followed by Precision Porsche.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm looking into purchasing a MK1 aero rear wing from this company ( unless I can find an OEM one). Anyone have any experience with this company and it products? Quality? Fit and Finish?
http://www.gruppetwo.com/?wpsc_produ...y=996996-turbo
TIA
Not familiar with that company but there is an MK1 taco wing for sale in the member classified. You may be able to pick up an authentic Porsche part for what Gruppe is selling there wings for.
Lol, the OEM piece is fiberglass too.
When it comes to wings, you want rigidity first and foremost. You don't want the middle of your wing drooping in 95 degree heat, do ya?
Thanks everyone. I missed out on the "OEM" wing but there will be another I hope if not until I get some definitive recommendations on an aftermarket wing I will hold out for OEM.
I also see Vertex sells an AM taco style wing too.
http://www.vertexauto.com/ShowItem/3...20Spoiler.aspx
Personally outside of OEM, I would first check MA Shaw to see if they make a mk1 taco, followed by Precision Porsche.
Just make sure any rep you get has the middle adjustable wing as some of the cheaper ones aren't adjustable.
Also be prepared to pay a bit extra for prep before paint if the frp piece has some waves in it.
You can also go the extra mile and top it off with the OEM Gurnee Flap.
I have checked MAshaw and they don;t show a taco style wing. Same for Precision Prosche. Yea no matter what I get paint prep will be paramount for all pieces.
I am interested but I don't really need the hood as I want to mount this to my existing hood. Pm me with a shipping estimate to San Jose, ca 95124 and how you want payment.
