13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIMS replaced in 2006, newer/better model?
Leading reported evidence
Replace ims
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
My IMS was replaced in 2006 and they just recently started installing installing the LN bearings.
Leading evidence: 'Replace ims' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'good thing' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check spring tonight' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
My car's clutch is fairly heavy, so I always assumed it was still on the original clutch, and was set to have it as well as the IMS replaced later this week to the tune of $2800.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The intermediate shaft seal is often replaced when the rear main seal is replaced.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
My car's clutch is fairly heavy, so I always assumed it was still on the original clutch, and was set to have it as well as the IMS replaced later this week to the tune of $2800.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hey guys,
I bought my 2002 Targa in May without service history and it has 81k miles on it right now. Because I frequent these silly forums I've always had the IMS bearing on the back of my mind. My car's clutch is fairly heavy, so I always assumed it was still on the original clutch, and was set to have it as well as the IMS replaced later this week to the tune of $2800.
I've been trying to contact previous owners to find out if the clutch was ever replaced, and eventually found out where the car was originally sold. Called up the dealer, and he was able to provide the following:
2006: New clutch, IMS bearing, RMS!
So turns out I only have 30k miles on my clutch and IMS bearing from 2006, and my first thought is that this 5 minute phone call just saved me from a $2800 bill. But now some new questions are popping into my head:
1. Was 2006 a new/better IMS design?
2. With my 2006 Porsche IMS, is it worth $1000 to upgrade to LN Engineering IMS?
3. I know a clutch can fail in 30k miles, but could something else be causing my heavy clutch?
Any help would be much appreciated!
Chris
Heavy, relative to what? ... another 911 clutch?
My C2's is heavier than any previous clutch I ever had except perhaps a long gone 1973 Plymouth RRunner clutch, but it is still quite acceptable.
If you are not hard on it or let it slip on steep inclines, it should last you much longer than 30k, likely 70k or more.
My 2 pennies!
The Porsche bearings come in three basic types - dual row, single and large single. The IMS shaft dictates the type of bearing. The Porsche bearing does not have many fans. You are likely to have the single, which may have the fewest fans. There are some that contend that the bearings fail by XX,XXX miles or not at all. If that is true you wouldn't want to change your bearing. In a nutshell, any Porsche improvement by 2006 would not help you because you have an older IMS.
If you shift into 6th at 50 mph and floor it, do you feel momentary lag that could be the clutch? That is one indicator of a bad clutch.
A possible reason for the heavy clutch is the PO removed the clutch booster spring. I have a picture on my home computer but not here at work. Removing the booster allows for much better clutch feel and less stalling.
You should call the dealer back and and ask which/whose IMS bearing they installed. As far as I am aware, Porsche does not sell the bearing as a separate part for dealer install, but some dealers DO install the LN bearing.
I also have a 2002 Targa. Mine has 67k on it and the original clutch and bearing. I was quoted $2,200 for a new clutch, ims bearing and rms. Should I request that my mechanic use a bearing from LN Engineering?
I asked the dealer if they installed an LN Engineering bearing, and he said definitely not. My IMS was replaced in 2006 and they just recently started installing installing the LN bearings. I'll call the dealer back to see if I can glean any more information from the IMS installation.
In response to the clutch heaviness, it's not insanely heavy, its just heavier than anything I've driven before and annoying when stuck in traffic. Also heavy enough to make it hard to get a smooth takeoff from a stop (been driving stick for 14 years).
When I still thought the car was on the original clutch with a heavy pedal, I thought it was a sign of a failing clutch, but now I'm thinking it might be a missing assist spring or something else. Will attempt to get in and check the spring tonight.
Ok, so I just got off the phone with the dealer to clarify, and this is what he's telling me was done in 2006 at 49k miles (currently have 80k):
1. Clutch kit: pressure plate, disc and release bearing
2. Rear main seal was replaced
3. Intermediate shaft seal was replaced
I haven't heard an intermediate shaft seal, do you think this could mean the IMS bearing? Or is there actually an IMS seal?
You'll find that a 996 clutch actually gets a little bit light as it starts to fail, not heavy. If your clutch is heavy, that's probably a good thing!
The intermediate shaft seal is not the same as the intermediate shaft bearing. The intermediate shaft seal is often replaced when the rear main seal is replaced. It's inexpensive and easy to access when you change the RMS.
Nope, it appears you are on your original bearing. Glad you clarified. That being said, if it's good so far it will *probably* be fine but what do I know... Given the option of changing it with an upcoming clutch job at minimal extra expense (besides the bearing itself), most here would probably do it. If however it now appears that you do not need a clutch, well, then you have to decide for yourself. That being said , if you do any of it, (Clutch, IMSB, RMS, etc) I think most here would also do all of them including the AOS as a "while you're in there" type of thing. One labor charge, 4 different things if not even more...
If you have the large single bearing it requires an engine takeapart to replace it. The LNE site has a section that describes what model years have what bearing type.
I am not even certain the LN replacement bearing existed in 2006. And even if it did, a Porsche dealer certainly would have installed an OEM bearing in those days.
When I had my LNE IMS retrofit done, my Indy put a sticker with the serial # of the bearing on my Driver's Manual. That, in addition to the invoice is proof to the lucky buyer of my excellently maintained car that the IMS has been replaced.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.