fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Comments on these 3

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHComments on these 3

Leading reported evidence

Inspect by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400)

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Also, please have the car inspected by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400).

Comments on these 3
Frequently discussed work

Check other signs of wear

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check for other signs of wear.

Comments on these 3
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Inspect by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'sign of the prior owners driving techniques' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check other signs of wear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

sign of the prior owners driving techniques

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

About the clutch, replacing the clutch that soon is probably a bad sign of the prior owners driving techniques.

Comments on these 3

Check other signs of wear

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check for other signs of wear.

Comments on these 3

Replace 2000 model year (i think)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Tom, don't forget the engine change for the 2000 model year (I think) from 3.4L to 3.6L.

Comments on these 3

Replace came more hp or torque

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

With that change came more HP or torque.

Comments on these 3
Frequently discussed actions (6)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check other signs of wear

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Check for other signs of wear.

Comments on these 3

Inspect by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

Also, please have the car inspected by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400).

Comments on these 3

Replace 2000 model year (i think)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Tom, don't forget the engine change for the 2000 model year (I think) from 3.4L to 3.6L.

Comments on these 3

Replace came more hp or torque

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

With that change came more HP or torque.

Comments on these 3

Replace clutch

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

About the clutch, replacing the clutch that soon is probably a bad sign of the prior owners driving techniques.

Comments on these 3

Set on blue (although seal gray is vvveeerrrrry nice too!)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

But I have my heart set on blue (although Seal Gray is vvveeerrrrry nice too!)

Comments on these 3
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

sign of the prior owners driving techniques

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

About the clutch, replacing the clutch that soon is probably a bad sign of the prior owners driving techniques.

Comments on these 3
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Still looking, but now that summer is winding down, the rush to buy is gone, which is a Good Thing. Found these three and would like your feedback on them. CarFax didn't find any problems for any of them. Naturally, I'll do a PPI. 1999 C4, 37726 mi Nav/Supple/Litronics, To be relisted on eBay (didn't meet reserve at $32.5k) 2000 C2, 32000 mi $40.8k, no outstanding options 2001 C2, 37975 mi $46k, Technic pkg/FullLeather Warranty to 2/2009 or 60k I really like the idea of a C4, but the 2001 with the warranty is appealing too. (How much is an aftermarket warranty for two years? $1500 to $2000?) Let the comments begin! And "Thanks" in advance. tom

POST 2Original post

Tom, don't forget the engine change for the 2000 model year (I think) from 3.4L to 3.6L. With that change came more HP or torque. Steve

POST 3Original post

I think you mean engine change in MY 2002 for US from 3.4 to 3.6.

POST 4Original post

My 01 C4cab is for sale. 20k miles, CPO w/ war thu 8/07. PM for more details or see the classifieds

POST 5Original post

With so little info, it's hard to make a judgement. All things equal, newer=better. So go with the 2001.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I _knew_ I'd forget something: the 2001 also has a new engine & clutch, done 10k miles ago. Mike: I saw your ad the day you put it up. But I have my heart set on blue (although Seal Gray is vvveeerrrrry nice too!) What do you think about the price for the 2001? tom

POST 7Original post

The '99 is the lightest of the 99/2000/2001 all of which have the 3.4L engine = more nimble. Try calculating the power/weight ratio to see what I mean. Also, the 99 will be the cheapest to buy too - that too with the most options !! Looks like a no brainer to me if the condition of the '99 is good. About the clutch, replacing the clutch that soon is probably a bad sign of the prior owners driving techniques. Check for other signs of wear. Clutches can go from 10K to 70/80K miles depending on driving practices. Also, please have the car inspected by porsche (their official inspection checklist, $250-$400). Its not a silver bullet but its DEFINITELY worth the money.

POST 8Original post

Can't comment on the prices, but the 01 has a questionable history if it got a new motor and clutch at 10k. Maybe nothing, but maybe an indication of abuse. Also, warranty is great but do some research on the warranty company (09 and 60k does not seem like CPO, but aftermarket warranty). Some warranty co's are much better than others so try a search to get opinions on the specific warranty company to see if it truly is a benefit. Good luck with whatever you choose!

POST 9Original post

All things being equal (or not), I would go with a C2 over a C4 and a car with a warranty over one without.

POST 10 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Sorry if I wasn't clear: the engine and clutch were changed at around 28k miles (38k-10k). Is that still too 'young'? Ah, here's a clue. CarFax says that there's two owners and the first was a lease until 28.8k! So the first owner might have missed a shift or something. And I'm pretty sure it's not CPO. CarFax lists the service contract starting on 2/2005, at 33,900. So it's a 4 year aftermarket plan. I'm interested enough to go and check it out. I'll find out which warranty company it's with and if this owner knows anything more about the engine/clutch change. And the trouble with the 99 is that it will be on eBay, so I don't really know what his reserve price is. Thanks for arming me with good questions! tom

POST 11Original post

Get the C4. Slap some snow tires on it in the winter and you can drive it anywhere without a care in the world!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.