7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPorsche part number decoding ???
Leading reported evidence
Use on multiple models
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
In my August 2006 price list from Porsche it shows 205,376 part numbers and many are used on multiple models.
Leading evidence: 'Use on multiple models' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use age old engineering adage of "form, fit and function"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Use age old engineering adage of "form, fit and function"
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The basic Porsche part number systems are made up at Weissach using the age old Engineering adage of "form, fit and function".
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
Is there a guide chart of what the second three-digit number means in Porsche part numbering?
In this example of 996 618 151 10, the number 618 seems to put this Litronic Ctrl Unit into Electronics category.
I'm looking for a chart that define the categories into three-digit numbers.
Thanks a lot,
Richard
Sorry, I do not believe there is such list/chart.
In my August 2006 price list from Porsche it shows 205,376 part numbers and many are used on multiple models. Some part numbers used on current cars go back over 20 years in the origin. Their is some logic to the numbering scheme but there are many many many exceptions.
What is your goal here - if I may ask?
^^^
Hope to get a list to organize the Porsche parts into categories such as Engine, Transmission, etc. I am putting together a database for a shopping cart to sell Porsche parts. Thanks for the reply.
I have found that Porsche makes up the numbers on many of the parts after their lunch break at the local beer gardens. On a recent project, I found three identical parts with three different numbers and one part with numbers that are not in any Porsche service manual or computer system.
well from a porsche perspective electronics would be 9
0 is diag
1 engine ? brainfart over 1 and 2
2 ?
3 powertrain
4 chassis
5 top ?
6 body
7 interior
8 ?
9 electronics
ill fix this list tomorrow few to many cockatails tonite
Ain't that the truth. The basic Porsche part number systems are made up at Weissach using the age old Engineering adage of "form, fit and function". Then Porsche added some of their own flavours and even managed to mix them up over the years. There is no breakdown chart available to the public. The only place I have seen such breakdowns is on the actual Engineering drawings and one has to trawl through thousands of these sometimes to find what you are looking for.
Once in a while one is able to obtain the rationale maybe for certain things like what does 925 or 955 really mean in Porsche parts number speak, then you find out it was differently applied to create 965. End result is that they know exactly what they are doing and we do not have a clue.
Unfortunately the almost religious belief that Porsche do things logically, in number sequence and are well organised sometimes results in incorrect assumptions being made by somebody looking for a part. It gets worse when they see the same part number except for the first three digit type number or what they think is the type number prefix. The end result is that they get the wrong part and it doesn't work.
Ciao,
Adrian.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
