3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHigh level of metal found during 911 C4S oil service
Leading reported evidence
Test service specifies.)
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
(ie: exactly as the oil testing service specifies.)
High level of metal found during 911 C4S oil service
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Test service specifies.)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test service specifies.)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
High level of metal found during 911 C4S oil service
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Carpokes: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I recently had my ‘09 911 C4S serviced (21,400 miles) and was told the tech found abnormal levels of metal in the oil. A sample was sent to Blackstone Labs who reported aluminum partials were 3 times normal and silicone was twice normal. The report went on to say this could be “piston scuffing”. The car has been serviced annually by Porsche technicians — with never a mention of this possible problem in the past. I’ve also been told that the 997.2 engines are quite bulletproof. A final suggestion was to drive the car another 1-2,000 miles and have another oil test or consider looking in the engine cylinders with a bore scope.
Anyone have a similar experience OR recommendations about what to do? If the the cylinders are scored, it sounds like and expensive engine re-build to me. Thanks in advance for any advice or recommendations.
Lortone
Not immune to scuffing unfortunately. I too was surprised to read that the 9A1/MA1 blocks do score in the latest Total 911 issue. (For instance see
https://medium.com/@lnengineering/cylin ... b051e95ddc
). I suppose a bore-scoping by a competent mechanic is the way to be sure.
I would tend to follow the recommendations about waiting and doing a second or even a third test. Oil samples need to be collected in a very specific way to make sure no outside or unrelated contamination. Labs can make mistakes too, so a follow-up might show everything to be normal.
Just a suggestion, but maybe try a different lab too. There are a couple, one of which is highly regarded - LN Engineering.
https://lnengineering.com/products/spee ... lysis.html
I found another one that I know nothing about but it looks promising nevertheless:
https://www.oaitesting.com/
PS - If in doubt, order a kit and take the sample yourself or ask to be present when the next oil sample is taken just to be sure it's done by the book. (ie: exactly as the oil testing service specifies.)
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.