fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Looks like a good idea?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHLooks like a good idea?

Leading reported evidence

Use smokeless powder (pyrodex)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

*edit* Yes, it looks that way - the requirements for storing firearms seem like they'd be tough to comply with if living in a multi-unit dwelling...interestingly, you need an explosives permit for black-powder shooting, but not if you use smokeless powder (pyrodex).

Original post Read captured discussion
Looks like a good idea?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use smokeless powder (pyrodex)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use smokeless powder (pyrodex)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use smokeless powder (pyrodex)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

*edit* Yes, it looks that way - the requirements for storing firearms seem like they'd be tough to comply with if living in a multi-unit dwelling...interestingly, you need an explosives permit for black-powder shooting, but not if you use smokeless powder (pyrodex).

Original post Read captured discussion
Looks like a good idea?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 5Original post

Hey, finally a compelling reason to buy a Targa.

POST 6Original post

People aim lower when it's a 996, however. Opening Salvo on Porsche 911 - Comm2A benefit Shoot - YouTube

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 12828163

Nah, still only valid if dressing hair is your chosen profession. I mean how much more "over compensation" can you throw into one video? I mean, dresses well, big gun, sports car, well kept garden, ... Showed the video to my wife last night. She was unimpressed. Apparently had he been driving AND shooting at the same time, that would have impressed her

POST 9Original post

It IS impressive that the British can make something patently macho - like shooting targets from a moving Porsche - dull and effeminate.

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 12831392

It's like a British Chicago

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 12831631

It's like a British "Chiraq," thank you Spike Lee!

POST 12Original post

For a country with a 'no' gun law we sure shoot a lot..

POST 13Original post

I assume that if you have money and an estate, it's probably easier to get a hunting gun license? *edit* Yes, it looks that way - the requirements for storing firearms seem like they'd be tough to comply with if living in a multi-unit dwelling...interestingly, you need an explosives permit for black-powder shooting, but not if you use smokeless powder (pyrodex).

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.