8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThe Grand Tour new series ep.6 featuring 996.1
Leading reported evidence
Use required electricity
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Personally I prefer to use the required electricity for something useful!
Leading evidence: 'Use required electricity' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use required electricity' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Not watched it all, but it features a blue 996.1 Carrera bought for £10k travelling across Africa for a race.
Thought it might be of interest to some of you on here.
Can’t say I’m that taken with the new presenters, but give it time….maybe.
We've been watching the new series and both of us said it's just a carbon copy of Top Gear with the new presenters.
I can't say it's not good cause it's about cars but it's the sort of programme you can switch off and walk away from and not feel you've missed something.
The 1st episode is about 3 high powered 'Muscle' cars, American of course and they go on a road trip around California and then get chased by some fighter jets, sound familiar?
Mr F B definitely brings a different atmosphere to the show, the one thing about him is that you know he's being honest and not playing up to the camera.
Quite an entertaining watch and enjoyed watching the 996 being an owner. Was nearly sent to Angola whilst " enjoying" national service in the SADF.....!!!
Not sure I could watch a whole series of those 3 though.
Can’t get used to the new guys, the American is irritating and skinny nerd is just as bad, the English beaded guy is ok.
Episode 5 is a race to the Spa track for the Williams team.
Just watched the 1st one, i think it's better than the BBCs effort with Paddy and Freddy by a long way, I quite enjoyed Jensen Buttons appearance around the track. It's all been done before but still better than whatever else is on these days.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
