23 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNo more sticky radio knobs
Leading reported evidence
Replace ok ones in the 2002
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just replaced the ok ones in the 2002 with new ones (pricy, but what isn�t on these cars), rotated the slightly tacky ones into the 2000, and set aside the very tacky third set.
Leading evidence: 'Replace ok ones in the 2002' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean with dish washing detergent and soft bush' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I just used isopropyl and done in 5 minutes for both.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
So I popped the ***** off and used some alcohol to clean off the rubberized layer and it looks and feels great....like new.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I had sticky ***** (sounds perverted when you write it) on my 06 Cayman S.Took them off and clean with dish washing detergent and soft bush.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I just replaced the ok ones in the 2002 with new ones (pricy, but what isn�t on these cars), rotated the slightly tacky ones into the 2000, and set aside the very tacky third set.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I just replaced the ok ones in the 2002 with new ones (pricy, but what isn�t on these cars), rotated the slightly tacky ones into the 2000, and set aside the very tacky third set.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I just replaced the ok ones in the 2002 with new ones (pricy, but what isn�t on these cars), rotated the slightly tacky ones into the 2000, and set aside the very tacky third set.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
23 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T052503Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The radio ***** on my 996 and 986 have gotten sticky....its a common problem I guess. So I popped the ***** off and used some alcohol to clean off the rubberized layer and it looks and feels great....like new. It makes no sense to me why Porsche used it in the first place.
My blockhead move:
Radio ***** are sticky on my 996, I added (1) **** to my cart on my last order from pelican.
The question is why would someone order (1) ****??
I�ve tried applying bourbon, scotch, vodka and gin liberally, but no matter how much I drink, the ***** seem the same.
I just replaced the ok ones in the 2002 with new ones (pricy, but what isn�t on these cars), rotated the slightly tacky ones into the 2000, and set aside the very tacky third set. I may try the isopropyl trick with the old set that I saved, just for grins.
I had sticky ***** (sounds perverted when you write it) on my 06 Cayman S.Took them off and clean with dish washing detergent and soft bush. They came out like new. No issues (yet) with my 04 Turbo ones.
Exactly. Why use something that is known to fail (can you say Maserati?) Probably promised an improved product by the supplier. I wonder if it�s only a problem in hotter climates like in Florida where my radio ***** just all of a sudden got very sticky after 5 years. Isopropyl alcohol worked great as you said. All in all a bit disappointing in $100,000+ car but no biggie. Plus side there is the weight savings....LOL
