9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHHeadlight High Beam
Reported or suspected cause
nasty little $100 (amazon uro brand)
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause · Original poster
But it was the nasty little $100 (Amazon URO Brand).
Leading evidence: 'nasty little $100 (amazon uro brand)' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'nasty little $100 (amazon uro brand)' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean sockets, and the connectors appear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I already cleaned the sockets, and the connectors appear to be good.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Agreed on the switch - but here's another thought (from a Canadian - my lights are on 24/7 whether I use the switch or not).
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
somehow I recall a bad running light will cause this but I could be WRONG
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
For some reason I was not ready the Bently wiring diagram right while testing the switch, I guess...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Headlight High Beam: Afternoon - my first 911 - water-pumper - 2002 996.2. The headlights will not stay on high beam. The flash works with everything lighting up. The left side is in need of a running light bulb. I already cleaned the sockets, and the connectors appear to be good. What is your experience? switch? relay? Thanks in advance. It has the Halogen headlights.
Thanks but I did figure that out, I push forward nothing happens. The HB's do not even light up. I pull back and they flash as I believe they are supposed to. I am thinking it has a relay somewhere that may be out - that I do not know where.
My guess is the switch, not because I've actually seen this fail, but because the lights work when you use the flash function. This indicates the power circuit to the lights is OK. Sorry, not much help.
Agreed on the switch - but here's another thought (from a Canadian - my lights are on 24/7 whether I use the switch or not). Do the HB work when the fog lights are on? With the headlight switch itself being a failure-prone component, is there any possibility a fault in that is preventing the HB from staying on, while allowing a flash (which would presumably work with or without fogs on).
After completely going through everything, I said screw it and bought a new switch - all is well now. For some reason I was not ready the Bently wiring diagram right while testing the switch, I guess...
But it was the nasty little $100 (Amazon URO Brand). I bought it from Amazon just in case I needed to send it back
. Alot easier sending something back then with our normal suppliers. Thanks everybody.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
