12 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHStone Guard Film
Leading reported evidence
Use who have done a decent job
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Are there installers that others have used who have done a decent job?
Leading evidence: 'Use who have done a decent job' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use who have done a decent job' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T181445Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am looking at getting my front bumper and perhaps the leading edges of the front wings and hood done in either VentureShield (3M) or in Scotchguard film. The initial enquiries I have made around here are that the usual suppliers/installers don't have the templates for the 997 and won't do it 'by hand'. Are there installers that others have used who have done a decent job? Are there templates available?
I also hear that the 3M film is clearer, but can yellow in time, and that the Scotchguard product lasts longer, but has a slightly textured finish?
Try Dijon Johnson on the north side of Brisbane -I don't have his contact details nay more but here is Linkedin page
http://www.linkedin.com/in/fastmustard
Not sure if he is still doing the film
Cool - was looking for someone local as well. All the research I've done has only identified people who are Sydney or Melbourne based or Porsche dealers.
Thanks Hugh. I just found a mob in Brisbane who also service the Sunshine coast and use the new premium film produced by Venture Shield (now owned by 3M). Got a decent price for the front bumper hood facing and around headlights and so on.
Dijon from the Racing Room came to the house and did the job. He has pre cut templates for all the models (some are hard to find) and did an extremely professional job. He has a Porsche heritage going back years and really knows his stuff. Can't speak more highly of his expertise and the quality of the material used. Great value for money.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
