13 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCam deviation unchanged after new pads
Leading reported evidence
Install on the correct of the actuator
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Do some research when installing as the pads look very similar but are different and need to be installed on the correct of the actuator.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Yes, I double-triple check the pad position having the hole and o-ring on the right side, counted the number of links between the dot/marking on cam (8 full links at TDC, rotated 360deg got 8 �in-between� links, rotated an other 360deg and back to 8 full links).
Leading evidence: 'Install on the correct of the actuator' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check pad position having the hole and o-ring' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Replace 2 guide rail pads and the �tensioner blade�
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I replaced the 2 guide rail pads and the �tensioner blade�.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Since I close the cam cover I ran the car twice while on jack stand: at idle until it reach temp.
Test solenoid: it clicked and the �plunger� came out
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I tested the solenoid: it clicked and the �plunger� came out!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Yes, I double-triple check the pad position having the hole and o-ring on the right side, counted the number of links between the dot/marking on cam (8 full links at TDC, rotated 360deg got 8 �in-between� links, rotated an other 360deg and back to 8 full links).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check pad position having the hole and o-ring
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Yes, I double-triple check the pad position having the hole and o-ring on the right side, counted the number of links between the dot/marking on cam (8 full links at TDC, rotated 360deg got 8 �in-between� links, rotated an other 360deg and back to 8 full links).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yes an other cam deviation question. here�s the story for a 2001 C4.
After dropping the oil sump I not only found a good amount of plastic pieces but the swirl pot tube on bank 1 side was also broken. All the plastic pieces probably accumulate in the tube until it the pressure made it crack open. Even the �big cylinder� of the swirl pot was blocked. I was never able to get the piece of guide rail out of it. Time to open the cam cover (bank 1 only).
I replaced the 2 guide rail pads and the �tensioner blade�. I was careful to follow all the directions for the timing (Bentley manual and a couple of You Tube video).
After all that, the cam deviation is almost the same. Before I had -6.5, now I have -6.04. I�m certainly disappointed but now I wonder what cause the deviation.
Did I miss the timing? Could it be the tensioner though it seemed ok when I dunk it in oil and pump a few time? Could it be the sensor?
Since I close the cam cover I ran the car twice while on jack stand: at idle until it reach temp.
No code, no engine light.
Any suggestion or input you could share would be appreciated. I would like to see a lower deviation, not on the upper limit. Or is it just the way the car is and as long as the deviation do not increase all is fine?
thanks.
Exhaust cam
Pointing toward cam cover (bank1 TDC)
I believe your engine is a 5 chain, so you�d need to change the vario cam pads to correct your deviation. It�s the dark brown pad under the small chain, seen below, there�s another one on the bottom of the vario actuator. Do some research when installing as the pads look very similar but are different and need to be installed on the correct of the actuator.
*Also of note - the vario-cam pads are actually white/ivory colored when new. They turn caramel/brown over time with exposure to heat and dirty oil� Also per DeJeeper�s rec, do a full ECU reset�
I forgot to add. I have done complete replacement of the whole Variocam Actuator unit ($1,000) several times and found that the deviation only changes 2-3 degrees. It does get you back in spec but it does not get you to zero deviation. My guess is the chain is probably having something to do with it too. There are 5 chains.
Thanks for your reply!
Yes i do have a 5 chains but it sounds I wasn�t very clear. I did change the vario cam pads and one chain guide rail because there was debris in the oil sump. I was expecting to see improvement on the deviation angle but nothing.
The pictures are only there to show that the I think I got the timing right when I reassembled everyrhing: intake cam notch pointing toward the cover and the exhaust cam slot align with the �line� where the cover split.
So if the deviation wasn�t coming from the vario cam pads (and they were definitively worn) then where can it come from. Someone mention the chain.
I�m just wondering what to chase next.
How many miles on the engine? Could the chains simply be stretched a bit? When re-timing, how many chain links did you count between the dots on the cogs? I did a complete engine rebuild with new chains, billet paddle, variocam pads, etc. and could only get to 2 degree deviation. Oh, for the variocam pads, did you position the open hole (for oil) correctly? I believe on one bank, one of the pads with the hole is "down" and on the other bank, "up". Are cam deviations different at idle versus 3500 RPMs?
Yea, your two small chains are worn/lengthened and need to be replaced.
How many miles on this engine? If over 50k-75k then new small "single row" chains are needed...
The small "single row" chains used in the 5 chain engine will wear/lengthen twice as fast as the long dual row chains used in the 5 chain and 3 chain engines..
Also since the timing procedure is performed on the "exhaust cam" and the "Sensor" is located on the "intake cam" ..The Deviation Spec will not change much unless the pads and small chains are both replaced..
I�m jealous; the rebuilt is on my list for next year.
The car is almost 121 000 miles.
Yes, I double-triple check the pad position having the hole and o-ring on the right side, counted the number of links between the dot/marking on cam (8 full links at TDC, rotated 360deg got 8 �in-between� links, rotated an other 360deg and back to 8 full links).
At idle I get low actual angle which climb to 24-25 deg at 3500rpm so actuators work and camshaft deviations stay stable at -6.13 for bank1 and -3.70 for bank 2.
Timing chains had been changed in 2016 (98 000 miles).
I tested the solenoid: it clicked and the �plunger� came out! And it had also been replaced in 2016.
what was weird is that when disassembling the vario cam is that the �bump stopper� inside the bigger �piston� (with the bigger spring) was missing. Meaning that it can travel down a bit more. And no, I did not loose it, it wasn�t there (bizarre).
Leaving the long chain going to intermediate shaft most likely being the culprit or what about the chain adjuster?
Haha, yes, sadly that is my only option as well. It's overdue from looking at my cam dev. And just mileage, it's time and it's not avoidable. Drive safe and often.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.