fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base

Leading reported evidence

Set but didn't pull the trigger

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I was looking at a used set but didn't pull the trigger on them before someone else got them.

Original post Read captured discussion
987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Set but didn't pull the trigger' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set but didn't pull the trigger' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use .1 s springs/shocks

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Is there any reason why I couldn't use the .1 S springs/shocks on my .2 base?

Original post Read captured discussion
987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set but didn't pull the trigger

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I was looking at a used set but didn't pull the trigger on them before someone else got them.

Original post Read captured discussion
987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base

Use .1 s springs/shocks

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Is there any reason why I couldn't use the .1 S springs/shocks on my .2 base?

Original post Read captured discussion
987.1 S Springs/Shocks on 987.2 Base
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

With over 100k miles on my 987.2 base C, my suspension is pretty worn. I would like to get coilovers at some point, but that's not in the cards right now since we're looking at moving within the year. I saw a post selling 987.1 S Cayman shocks and struts (with 20k on them) for a reasonable price, but am wondering if the spring rates will be a concern (or if there's any other reasons these wouldn't work). As I understand it, the 987.1 base, .1 S, .2 base, and .2 S all have different spring rates from factory. Is this because of the different engines (and weight differences) or does the S just feature a more "sporty" spring rate than the base? Is there any reason why I couldn't use the .1 S springs/shocks on my .2 base?

POST 2Original post

IMHO, if you are on a budget, you should Not have any issues with the 987.1 S struts and springs. If your struts are worn, you will be surprised by the improved ride the newer shocks will provide. BTW, where are you located? PS: Just realized that this post was almost one year old.. wander what the OP ended doing..

POST 3Original post

I was looking at a used set but didn't pull the trigger on them before someone else got them. I'm most likely going to end up doing Bilstein B6 sport shocks w/ the Cayman R springs ; but I'm not making any purchases any time soon since we're moving (across the world) and there's a chance I sell the car.

POST 4Original post

I went with R springs and Koni Sports. Spyder performance refresh kit. WONDERFUL!!!

POST 5Original post

Interesting post. Has any one just cut the stock springs 15-20mm or so? Not sure if putting stiffer springs on old struts is warranted in my case atm. But thinking of lowering the car a little to see how the fitment looks/feels...thanks

POST 6Original post

IMHO, cutting the springs is the worse decision you can make Instead, buy a set of KW springs, they cost you about $450 for the set, are TUV approved and they are 'progressive este springs' this means you will not be bouncing all over the place.. and these will lower your car about 1" .

POST 7Original post

Cutting springs stiffens the spring. Plus you need to heat and bend the tail to match the perch. Not something most people can do. I'd just find a set of springs and do all the work once. It's not a bad but but you'll just end up doing it twice. Two alignments too. You know you want to lower it ....just do it once and do it right. Heck you are in Maryland...I am in Richmond...come and drive my car.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.