fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
2 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHDefault Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Leading reported evidence

Replace under a previous owner less than four years

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

For what it's worth, one of the two turbos was replaced under a previous owner less than four years and under 17,000 km ago.

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check
Frequently discussed work

Check first —

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you were diagnosing this from scratch, what would you want checked first — before anyone starts taking the exhaust and turbos apart?

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace under a previous owner less than four years' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check first —' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 2 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Check first —

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you were diagnosing this from scratch, what would you want checked first — before anyone starts taking the exhaust and turbos apart?

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Check vacuum lines or connectors

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

With the boost faults hitting both banks at once, have they mentioned specifically how they checked all the vacuum lines or connectors that might have been disturbed during the PDK service and underbody work?

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Run checks, and at

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Only after I pushed did they actually run checks, and at that point they reported a

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Run perfectly

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

, that's a really frustrating situation, having all those problems appear right after a major service on a car that was running perfectly.

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check
Frequently discussed actions (5)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check first —

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you were diagnosing this from scratch, what would you want checked first — before anyone starts taking the exhaust and turbos apart?

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Check vacuum lines or connectors

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

With the boost faults hitting both banks at once, have they mentioned specifically how they checked all the vacuum lines or connectors that might have been disturbed during the PDK service and underbody work?

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Replace under a previous owner less than four years

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

For what it's worth, one of the two turbos was replaced under a previous owner less than four years and under 17,000 km ago.

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Run checks, and at

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Only after I pushed did they actually run checks, and at that point they reported a

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check

Run perfectly

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

, that's a really frustrating situation, having all those problems appear right after a major service on a car that was running perfectly.

Default Boost loss + multiple new faults immediately after a major service — sanity check
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

2 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Hoping for some perspective from people who know these cars far better than I do. I'll keep names and locations out of it, but I'm happy to share more detail privately with anyone willing to help. Car: 2010 997.2 Turbo, PDK , ~71,500 km. I've owned it about two years and it has been flawless — no warning lights, no boost issues, nothing. It's my first car and I look after it obsessively. I took it to an official Porsche centre for a major scheduled service at ~71,500 km. Per the service record, the work included spark plugs , belts off and refitted, battery replacement, PDK service with oil sump replacement, an underbody treatment, and a long diagnostic session — which flagged no turbo or boost faults at all. On the very first proper drive after the service (a longer motorway trip), problems started appearing. Over roughly the next few hundred km, in approximately this order: a light/"dead" zone on-centre in the steering at motorway speed a rear-right cabin noise on smooth tarmac noticeably more liquid from the exhaust and much blacker tips a different cold-start sound a mechanical noise from underneath, then a metallic resonance around 3,000 rpm and a low hum between roughly 2,000–3,000 rpm and then, progressively, almost total loss of boost The key oddity: through all of this, no warning light and no dash error message. Here's where it gets frustrating. Initially the centre's position was that none of this could be related to the service because they "hadn't worked in that area." But their own service record shows the work was concentrated exactly around there — belts off and refitted, PDK oil sump, the full underbody treatment, the battery. Only after I pushed did they actually run checks, and at that point they reported a bent exhaust heat shield (which they straightened), a wheel rebalance, and then attributed the boost loss to "turbines oxidised with age" and a faulty actuator. When I pressed further, they shared the PIWIS fault codes — boost-regulator faults on both banks : P1084, P1086, P1087, P1089, P1165, P1168, P1256, P0299. They found oil residue on one turbo only. For what it's worth, one of the two turbos was replaced under a previous owner less than four years and under 17,000 km ago. Throughout, the responses have been slow — sometimes more than ten days between replies — which has made an already stressful situation harder. What I'd love the community's read on: Do boost-regulator/actuator codes across both banks , appearing together like this, point more toward genuine turbo wear, or toward something on the control/electrical/vacuum side that could be disturbed during work in that area? Is it plausible for boost to collapse like this with no dash warning at all ? Does a bent heat shield in that area suggest something was contacted or disturbed underneath during service? If you were diagnosing this from scratch, what would you want checked first — before anyone starts taking the exhaust and turbos apart? Has anyone seen a similar cluster of symptoms appear right after a major service? I'm not here to bash anyone — I genuinely want to understand what's most likely going on so I can make a sensible decision before authorising any irreversible teardown. If anyone with real experience on these cars is willing to go deeper, I'd be very grateful to continue by private message and share more detail, including documentation. Thanks in advance — this car means a lot to me and I want to get it right. Thank you Orlando

POST 2Original post

Hey @9972888 , that's a really frustrating situation, having all those problems appear right after a major service on a car that was running perfectly. With the boost faults hitting both banks at once, have they mentioned specifically how they checked all the vacuum lines or connectors that might have been disturbed during the PDK service and underbody work? Adding those details might help some of the pros here point you in the right direction.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.