4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDue Diligence - New/Used '03 C4S
Leading reported evidence
Replace "faulty oil separator" due
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
(During the same service...) A tech also replaced a "faulty oil separator" due to "a large amount of smoke reported on start-up."
Leading evidence: 'Replace "faulty oil separator" due' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace "faulty oil separator" due' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
A tech replaced the "rear main intermediate shaft seal..."
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
An inconvenience, but if the one on the car you are considering has been replaced, I would count it as no big deal.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Pelican Parts: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T173940Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello -
I would like to ask you all few questions that you have no doubt been asked numerous times before - but I simply do not know the answers and would appreciate learning.
I'm looking into purchasing a used '03 996 C4S. The car I am interested in is out of state so I am going off descriptions and scanned-in past paperwork for services completed. All work in question was performed by a Porsche dealer / workshop in 2009 @ mile 17,500 by the second (latest) owner. The car now has 25K - and here are my concerns / questions:
#1). A tech replaced the "rear main intermediate shaft seal..."
- Is this the infamous "rear main seal" that I've heard so much about?
- The report says that the new buyer (back in '09) saw small drops of oil - so this got replaced. Have I cleared a hurdle OR will it likely go out again?
- I know that there is the intermediate shaft bearing to watch for.... are these two related in any way?
#2). (During the same service...) A tech also replaced a "faulty oil separator" due to "a large amount of smoke reported on start-up."
- Big deal?? How worried should I be on this one??
I do plan on having it looked at by a mechanic too however, do these mechanical issues sound so serious that I should move on and continue my search? Essentially, is this a lemon? Seems to me that these issues cropped up pretty early.... I love the car - but I am concerned.
Thanks in advance for everyone's thoughts.
Kind Regards,
L Hunt
Those are two different things. There RMS is the Rear main seal. The IMB is the bearing on the intermediate shaft under the crank. I would have a mechanic look at it for a very nice, long PPI. Receipts are good, but nothing saves you more money than a great mechanic doing a PPI.
Robert
As Robert has indicated previously, these are two very different issues. Neither of them is unheard of with the 996. The air oil separator (AOS) is known to fail such that smoke is generated. An inconvenience, but if the one on the car you are considering has been replaced, I would count it as no big deal.
The IMS seals are also known to leak, not the same as a rear main seal (RMS). The most troublesome issue with the M96 engines is, as Robertt has pointed out, with the bearing on the intermediate shaft. I suggest that you search for IMS bearing issues on this list as well as on the Renntech or Rennlist sites. There are ways to deal with this if you are afraid that one might fail. I replaced mine with the LNE ceramic bearing when I did a clutch replacement at ca. 45K miles and I sleep well at night. I really appreciate my 996. What a bargain for the performance that you get!
Guys - I really appreciate the info and input. It does seem that there is a TON of info one all these issues.... Nevertheless - your direct feedback helps.
Kind Regards - Lindsey Hunt
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
