8 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAir boxes: Standard or after market..?
Leading reported evidence
Use k&n
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use k&n' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace box completely would go this either evoms or cup' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Replace box completely would go this either evoms or cup
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
If I was changing box completely would go this either evoms or cup
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I guess if the ECU is measuring air flow it's okay to change the size/shape of your intake with an aftermarket intake.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Quick question: Air boxes - best to stick with standard or switch to after market - What are the pro's and con's..?
I understand that there is no performance gain to be achieved from fitting an after market induction kit, and the only real difference is the induction noise..
I've got a K&N induction kit on the 996, and it really does sound great under acceleration. However, I've been told that original is best and that an after market kit can muck around with the MAF settings, create an almost vortex style air intake which can result incorrect air readings, decreased performance and lesser fuel economy. Fuel economy - who cares. But over all is it recommended to stick with standard or keep the K&N or similar kit..?
Searching the net there seems to be some conjecture that says that K&N can cause some issues with the MAF (Mass airflow sensor)
http://rennlist.com/forums/996-forum/238208-mass-airflow-sensor-failure-996-k-and-n.html
http://www.renntech.org/forums/topic/42502-anyone-have-any-issues-with-the-kn-drop-in-air-filter/
http://www.6speedonline.com/forums/996/164276-k-n-maf.html
Read these links and then make your call, I have an aftermarket Eurocup GT intake and combined with a sports exhaust the noise is quite intoxicating
A common problem with the fabric 'oilable' type air filters (like the reusable K&N ones) are that people put too much oil on, and that leads to the destruction of your MAF (I think it only affects the hot wire type ones though) as the oil gets sucked into the sensor
I guess if the ECU is measuring air flow it's okay to change the size/shape of your intake with an aftermarket intake.
at the end of the day your engine is a big air pump, and you want to improve both the intake and exhaust and then tune for the improvement
I did the resonator delete with the standard box and filter (40mins and couple of bucks at bunnings)
Have used K&N with other cars with no issue. As Russ said "people put to much oil on"
If I was changing box completely would go this either evoms or cup
http://www.evoms.com/996_Carrera_Air_Intake_kit_Evoms_V_Flow_p/intkvf996na.htm
http://www.eurocupgt.com/acatalog/eurocup_porsche_intake_induction_kits.html
I have the eurocup and it seems to be a reasonable piece of kit, the only issue is that is open and being particularly aggressive on a skid pan I managed to drench it in water and needed to get some tuning down on the motor afterwards.
Doubt it is an issue in normal wet weather driving conditions but just something to mindful of when driving through large puddles
Stick to the standard, someone in the US just recently damaged their MAF from the K&N filter as well.
As for the intake itself its widely debated, the consensus (and what I agree with) is that the K&N reduces power because it pulls in warm air from the engine bay. The EVOMS intake does look okay that would be better than the K&N.
If you want the best of both worlds (stock box with better sound) get the original and pull out the Helmholtz resonator and block it with some DIY plumbing items or get yourself the Fabspeed "cold air intake" which consists of a CF look block off part and a straight silicone tube.
JR in the US also mentions the 997 3.8S box as being the only possible intake upgrade.
FWIW I had the BMC reusable filter and the car didnt feel as responsive so out it came...
I know very little about this topic except to say that I recently had a 996 with a K&N air filter Pre Purchase Inspected by a reputable Porsche specialist and they noted the following "Vehicle is fitted with a K&N air filter which will damage the air mass sensor if left".
This is actually true to some degree, the oil from the K&N filter damages or fouls the MAF.
Widely debated but the consensus again is OEM paper is best. The cotton filters are difficult to re oil and the only performance they provide is the most minimal at the very top end.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.