12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 O2 Sensor Delete
Leading reported evidence
Run secondary 02's
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
There were places that sold boxes that went between teh 02 and the ECU and the signal was bracketed in to a "pass" level on the fly so you just ran secondary 02's with the box and the ECU always saw a acceptable efficiency rating.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This is only about the secondary 02 which do nothing except tell if the cat is working at full efficiency, it does nothing else with the ECU , the Primary 02 is used to adjust the EFI..
Leading evidence: 'Run secondary 02's' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust efi' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This is only about the secondary 02 which do nothing except tell if the cat is working at full efficiency, it does nothing else with the ECU , the Primary 02 is used to adjust the EFI..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
When I was getting occasional cat errors, my local indy suggested programming those post-cat sensors out (I think they're part of the "stricter emissions" option which not all 996s have anyway) - I decided to replace the sensors first, but still - you should be able to disable them without mounting any additional devices.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Why would the secondary O2 sensors be used for anything outside of cat health?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The DME makes adjustments to long term fuel trim using data from the secondary O2's; basically the DME includes cat health/efficiencies into its calculations on fuel trim.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Adjust efi
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This is only about the secondary 02 which do nothing except tell if the cat is working at full efficiency, it does nothing else with the ECU , the Primary 02 is used to adjust the EFI..
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
When I was getting occasional cat errors, my local indy suggested programming those post-cat sensors out (I think they're part of the "stricter emissions" option which not all 996s have anyway) - I decided to replace the sensors first, but still - you should be able to disable them without mounting any additional devices.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
There were places that sold boxes that went between teh 02 and the ECU and the signal was bracketed in to a "pass" level on the fly so you just ran secondary 02's with the box and the ECU always saw a acceptable efficiency rating.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The DME makes adjustments to long term fuel trim using data from the secondary O2's; basically the DME includes cat health/efficiencies into its calculations on fuel trim.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Good afternoon!
My goal is to delete my secondary / downstream o2 sensor (or signal) to the DME. I�ve got a 997 GT3 exhaust setup on my 3.4L but having my catalytics deleted I�ve placed the secondary o2 in the exhaust (farthest point from the first o2 sensors). The only reaction to the car is error code and check engine light.
My question: Is there anyway to wire in a loop setup similar to the airbag delete or GT3 wing wiring to avoid the engine light? Or a ROW tune / programming that can be utilized?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions or feedback ✌🏼
-Robert
@FLAT6REBEL
The most common solution I've seen is to put at least 2" of tube between the Exhaust and the 02,
and use one that has that small element of an catalytic converter element in it. You can test it with a durametric or scanner if it can display the actual value.
There were places that sold boxes that went between teh 02 and the ECU and the signal was bracketed in to a "pass" level on the fly so you just ran secondary 02's with the box and the ECU always saw a acceptable efficiency rating. Unfortunately these are now very hard to find as the fed stomped on the folks selling them.
You do know that the ECU/DME uses the signals from the O2 sensors to detect and tune how the engine runs. Including such things as fuel injector timing and whether the engine is running rich or lean. I think eliminating the O2 sensors is a bad idea and probably would violate federal mandates. But what the heck, your car and your engine. And to the best of my knowledge, US or ROW tunes or programming isn't going to remove the need for the O2 sensors.
This is only about the secondary 02 which do nothing except tell if the cat is working at full efficiency, it does nothing else with the ECU , the Primary 02 is used to adjust the EFI..
This is standard to run track cars evne the $$$$$ porsche cats don't like extended days of WOT.
He's also talking about a GT3 which flagged it to me as a track toy..
I've seen track only cars that Porsche had removed the cats andsecondayr 02 sensors, back before even that was deemed "bad"... Now they wont help even for track toys.
When I was getting occasional cat errors, my local indy suggested programming those post-cat sensors out (I think they're part of the "stricter emissions" option which not all 996s have anyway) - I decided to replace the sensors first, but still - you should be able to disable them without mounting any additional devices.
This is correct:
This is not correct:
Yes, the primary O2 sensors provide most of the data for DME adjustments, and yes, the secondary O2's are used to monitor cat health. However simply triggering a CEL as cats fail is not the sole purpose of the secondary O2's. The DME makes adjustments to long term fuel trim using data from the secondary O2's; basically the DME includes cat health/efficiencies into its calculations on fuel trim.
Well what happens with the row cars that dont even have rear o2 sensors? I guess the fueling programs r different? I personally have never seen an issue in any make of car that has had the rear o2 sensor readinesses turned off.
Either fool the computer or delete the feature with software. Both r effective.
Why would the secondary O2 sensors be used for anything outside of cat health?
O2 is consumed in the cat during normal operation, It would make absolutely no sense to use a post-cat sensor for anything engine control related as you do not know the relative health of the catalytic converter. The only purpose is to verify an offset between upstream and downstream sensors to confirm that the cat is functioning.
Near as i can tell from the signal voltages the downstream o2's are not fancy, the signal looks like a standard 02 not a wideband or anything..
Can't imagine how they would give any real useful data.. I'll have to look when I pull my next log for the tuner..
Thank you for all the input. Going to switch to those 45 degree mini cats. I�ve tried extenders but those didn�t help. I�m mainly looking for secondary o2 sensors like I�m running it with no cats. I think ideally will be a ROW tune
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.