21 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHIs a PPI really worth it? (996).
Leading reported evidence
Replace year ago
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Reviewed the service history etc and receipts today - says the IMS was postponed when clutch changed a year ago.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
Leading evidence: 'Replace year ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check 996' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So you could get a partial PPI (PPPI) just to check the big $ items?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Best thing to do is to negotiate exactly what you want looked at, so they don't spend 30 minutes testing the interior buttons (you can do that) but instead work to a fixed price looking at things in descending order of priority.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check 996
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Best thing to do is to negotiate exactly what you want looked at, so they don't spend 30 minutes testing the interior buttons (you can do that) but instead work to a fixed price looking at things in descending order of priority.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
21 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T222516Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
If it can't reveal if the IMS has an issue (996 - seems to be the major concern) and everything else checks out - service history / receipts for work done etc. what's the point? Piece of mind ? Not sure the centre preparing the PPI are liable in any way so sounds like a money pit to be honest. I've driven a car I like this weekend - it went well / looks well maintained inside and out / stops and idles properly - has a warranty - what the hell else is there besides telling me that the clip that holds the fuel flap open needs replacing.....
Jim.
If it's been in a major accident is usually a big one unless you know what to look for. Generally, a professional is gong to be able give you a good 'picture' of where the cars at, wear on major components etc.
for a few hundred $$$ it's worth getting another opinion, the alternative can be much more costly. Up to you, if you've already made your mind up just buy it!
Hi Jim,
In my opinion I think it is worthwhile getting a Porsche specialist to look over any car you are looking at buying. Even if you are comfortable with service history etc. and it does indeed check out, you will have piece of mind but also know what possible items are in need of replacement in the future. Then you can budget accordingly. On the flipside a PPI may uncover something that you didn't pick up and it would have potentially saved you thousands. Each to their own I suppose but the fact that you have a warranty on this one is also a bonus. Good luck with the search.
Steve
Are the doors and windows operating as they should?....9 micro switches in each door alone,wear left on rotors and pads,that sticking ignition barrel should that feel like that? Just a small example that only experience can answer.
Cheers guys - I'm not an expert, was just after opinion really.
I did discuss what the current owner thought needed doing over the next 18months / 2 Years - Rotors and pads came up.
I did notice a whine when on the power in 6th gear but it was intermittent and could have even been road noise. Happened 2 - 3 times for a couple of seconds only. (I drove the car for 1 hour plus). I tried to find the noise by accelerating and decelerating but couldn't artificially reproduce it.
This may sway me towards a PPI as I want to know if it's gearbox related.
Jim.
Depends on how well you know 996's and if you've got the tools and a thorough checklist you can go through on the car.
Things that you might not be able to do is compression & vacuum checks, engine diagnostic readouts and
bore scope (if you included it in the PPI
).
The PPI might just identify one item which you might not have picked up and should almost instantly justify the cost.
This is a bit of a long shot, but w
as the stereo unit on? The stock stereo seems to have this weird thing where it makes a whine with the RPM which is probably to do with the electrical load. You can diagnose it by switching the stereo to AUX and turning up the volume. Otherwise if the whole stereo unit is off and it does it, then that's not it.
I'm wondering if people are getting PPIs on non P cars of a certain vintage? Is there a point where sale price vs PPI price doesn't make sense?
Does expertise within a car club make a difference? Or is PFA as good if not better in this regard? During ownership of these modern classics almost certainly new issues will pop up, but I suspect most are readily diagnosable , if not treatable at home.
Just wondering out loud!
Interesting point Tazzie. I would think it would be as soon as you have an engine or gearbox which isn't cheap then you would. Eg. My civics engine + gearbox can be bought for less than 3k second hand. Good luck getting those for 20k all up on the 996.
I can't imagine many people who buy Ferrari's, Lamorghinis or other exotics would not get them checked out by a mechanic.
Do you have access to a hoist? There could be telling signs not to mention oil leaks that you may not see.....
Take our own backyard (Tassie - much more choice on the north island).... where would you take a 928 (like I just bought) for a PPI and have confidence that they knew what they were looking for? Same could be said of most classics and older cars....
Just getting it up on a hoist and getting compression tests can be very valuable. Things like leaking/weeping fluids, underbody damage, rusty/crushed exhUsts, overspray from repairs etc etc are very valuable. A car with 70% compression in one cylinder will still idle and drive well. The 996 also is known for RMS issues.
i bought a car once that would never have passed 15 minutes on the hoist. But I bought it because I was in a hurry and I liked the look of it. Even having a second opinion to throw a cold bucket of reality is worth it. I spent many hours and thousands of $$ correcting issues which were obvious if you got underneath. I may have still bought the car but it would have been at a lot lower price, with the documented list of things needing attention.
Best thing to do is to negotiate exactly what you want looked at, so they don't spend 30 minutes testing the interior buttons (you can do that) but instead work to a fixed price looking at things in descending order of priority. If they run out of time it's likely they found something bigger higher up the list, which will tell you all you need to know.
The car purchase I was most happy about was when I researched the model extensively, wrote myself out a two-page checklist and went through it all, one by one. The dealer laughed at me and tried to embarrass me into stopping but I gave him the cold stare and went about my business. I found a couple of things which cost them to put right (things like worn door rubber) and thus I eliminated niggles and was happy with the purchase.
so my recommendation is to get a long list of things to check for a 996, check off the ones you can do yourself, and pay someone to get it on a hoist to check the others.
PPI for sure. A 996 is what, $50k give or take at the moment?
Don't risk spoiling what could be one of the most satisfying experiences of your life by skimping on a few hundred bucks. Plus when the PPI comes back positive then you will have that extra satisfaction.
The problem lies when there are several cars that strike the eye. How many PPIs are too many? It's like househunting (something I've never done). It all adds up!
2 of the last 3 cars I bought I got a PPI done in preference to the cost of flying interstate. Bought them site unseen which worked OK. In both cases the results of the PPI formed significant part of the purchase discussion. Without exaggerating if you get caught out with an unseen yet significant issue it could cost on the tens of thousands to fix. Would always get a PPI personally. 3rd car I bought from a friend in the trade and was / is a peach.
With so many bidding now days with your PPI , maybe you could just post that your results are for sale to recoup monies in a multi car sutuation
Just a thought ….
I would PPI , worth the money in my experience unless you got a Bargain and then have a buffer to do work or you know your cgonna hot rod etc and go through the car anyway.
Lots of 996 parts from wroteoffs available
Cheers for the input - stereo was off..
Reviewed the service history etc and receipts today - says the IMS was postponed when clutch changed a year ago. Will have a word with mechanic tomorrow see why he thought that did not need doing.
Jim.
PPI saved me from buying a very un-sorted MK2 996 import as well as saving me a flight to see it, $500 very well spent
Also looks good in the documentation to have a PPI for the next owner IMO
+1 Particularly when
1) after the seller gives you there PPI, you ask as a buyer, have you had any of those items fixed on the PPI. (If mechanicals aren't fixed / servicing further delayed = hmmm)
2) Shows that a good set of compression and cyclinder leak down test numbers at one point in time can go south pretty quickly if the current owner didn't maintain it or treat it well or was unlucky whilst they had the keys on their watch in a relatively short period of time.
As I see it, PPI is money well spend given:
1) Demonstrates you are a serious buyer. Not convinced a sane buyer person would drop circa $400 to $900 a PPI for the privilege of pissing a seller about.
2) High probability you have the rosy "P" goggles on and your probability of premature ejaculation is a lot higher than someone who has more experience having gone through/ had their fair share of "P"'. But you need to ensure you have it on good authority that the selected PPI workshop / tech going the report have actually gone through / had their fair share of "P".
3) Coupled with a quote (costs you nothing) on what it costs to fix items found, given your already tight state of mind having dropped coin on a PPI, basic common sense would have you going into a deal with a starting negotiating position that a price discussed before committing to the PPI (could be the advertised) less what you dropped on the PPI is the maximum your expect to / will pay. At the other end, with PPI in hand, you need to at least start with a deduct (from previously discussed amount) the cost to fix the non shit bit items in the PPI (give seller a copy) and need to nicely point out with direct references to their add: Excellent now only good. Good down to fair. Fair down to got a spend some coin to get this up to scratch.
If the PPI shows there was not one bit of information on it that you didn't already know and their was noting wrong with it, you paid circa $700 for some motivation to buy it straightaway and consider it a downpayment on not having those , woulda, shoulda, conversions with yourself after some other punter takes it before you. I am sure circa $700 is worth the smile on your dial when you just get to see it parked in the garage, let alone driving it in and out instead of wasting time still looking for one
PS A PPI was the best $700 dollars I spent this year and will be the best return I see this year on any investment I make. Eg a x20 banger / bagger. Eg After covering the cost of the PPI, I saved myself from having to more than likely fork out 20 times the PPI price in addition to my purchase price to bring the car up scratch that I was none the wiser about had I not had a full PPI done.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.