fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Forum Australia

991.1 vs 991.2

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
22 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCH991.1 vs 991.2

Reported or suspected cause

issue long term

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

An RS is always an RS, engine is probably the issue long term with the .1 RS.

991.1 vs 991.2
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'issue long term' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'issue long term' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 22 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

issue long term

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

An RS is always an RS, engine is probably the issue long term with the .1 RS.

991.1 vs 991.2
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T013556Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

hi all to those in the know, or have done so which is the better car to drive?

POST 2Original post

Articles I’ve read all say the 991.2 is better but I have not driven a 991.2 so I can’t comment

POST 3Original post

I have own both at the same time and done thousand of kms back to back including driving the Furka, Grimsel, Susten and the San Bernardino passes..plus others. I have also tracked them back to back at Spa. IMO, the 991.2 is a genuine step on from the 991.1. it’s angrier, louder, rides better, turns in better and pulls much harder at the bottom end.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 284078

Sounds like some pretty conclusive testing!

POST 6Original post

Quotes source post: 284078

Well that is some solid advice!

POST 7Original post

I’ve had 3 x .1 & 1 x .2, my votes for the .2 as the better car (except for the exhaust note). I assumed you are talking Carrera S?

POST 8Original post

Question; Is a 991.2 GT3 worth the 100k current premium to a 991.1 GT3? (Factoring in the bonus extended warranty etc. on the 991.1)

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

here's hoping the 991.2 prices will start to fall a bit when the 992 comes out

POST 10Original post

Then the question of 991.1 GT3 RS or 991.2 GT3 seeing as they are pretty much same same at the moment in terms of asking $$$.

POST 11Original post

An RS is always an RS, engine is probably the issue long term with the .1 RS.  I think it'll be viewed as an orphan between the Mezger and current cup based engine in the .2

POST 12Original post

Quotes source posts: 284391, 284420

Sounds like we share the same saved searches on Carsales 😂 991.2 GT3 seem to be dropping fast, a couple now at low 300s and quite a few around while 991.1 seem to have plateaued at mid 200s.  I reckon I'd stump up the extra $50-75k to get into the newer car with 4.0, manual if you prefer and no engine issues.  For peace of mind and resale, i reckon I'd rather a good engine than a known problem engine with a warranty.

POST 13Original post

Quotes source post: 284447

991.1 at low 200’s has got my attention but then one thing leads to another and I’m looking at .2’s.............I’d be looking to track and hill climb it so I’m struggling to justify the $$$$ if I was to have an excursion in it though. I’ll be sitting tight for a little longer methinks for some very low hanging fruit!

POST 14Original post

.2 manual is the answer when they come off lease imo Then you will own your lap time

POST 15Original post

Quotes source post: 284451

Yep I've done the same.  I reckon a manual .2 is the go if they ever fall enough to make it viable for track use.  Looking at track cars I've owned, they do get a bit banged up over time with chunks of rubber, stone chips, excursions into gravel and grass.  And 200+ is still a LOT to punt into the wall. By contrast, my Mazda "fell" off the trailer the other day and was held up by the front splitter.  PITA but just a few scratches and a couple of busted brackets, dodgy up a fix and carry on.  Would be hating it if that was a mint GT3.

POST 16Original post

Quotes source post: 284451

You'd climb a hill very quickly in this?  How much is that trophy worth to ya? https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2018-Porsche-911-GT2-RS-991-Auto-MY18/SSE-AD-5669214

POST 17Original post

Quotes source post: 284563

GT2 is way too much car for me.

POST 18Original post

Why not a 996 or 997 cup car? Bung on the plates from your GT3 and off ya go. Dare say you'd be deaf by the time you got to the track though 🙉

POST 19Original post

Key part of my competition goals is to drive too (and back from!) events.

POST 20Original post

Quotes source post: 284569

Considered dial it down a couple of notches  Eg that price /2.5 and that hp / 1.33 and you can still have gt2 bragging rights but it's in the form of a 997 ( even comes with a cage for events)  just dial the suspension down a notch after an event.  It Looks very comfy even with the cage.

POST 21Original post

Quotes source post: 284576

I used to think that too.  Even drove the M3 all the way to Bathurst, lapped at pace and drove home.  But history shows it's a risky business, plenty of days ended with a busted car. I've come full circle, M3 will soon be replaced with another SUV, dedicated track car is in the garage, new trailer completed a couple of weeks ago, remote electric winch and all 👌🏻 . Peace of mind means I can drive it HARD 😡

POST 22Original post

Quotes source posts: 284336, 284418

Only 3 of the 991.1’s - what would you know 🤣 🤣 🤣 Agree - I’m hanging out for that right now, I don’t see many 991.2’s moving so maybe that is a sign

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.