4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCamera detector
Reported or suspected cause
good thing
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Most over-read by quite a big margin, which is probably a good thing.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also picks up lasar (as the S1) and TRUVELO (?) etc that measure your speed from two know points (ie bridges where the camera PHOTOGRAPHS your plate and DOESNT use radar/lasr so are undetectable).
Leading evidence: 'good thing' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'good thing' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Use radar/lasr so are undetectable)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also picks up lasar (as the S1) and TRUVELO (?) etc that measure your speed from two know points (ie bridges where the camera PHOTOGRAPHS your plate and DOESNT use radar/lasr so are undetectable).
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Use radar/lasr so are undetectable)
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also picks up lasar (as the S1) and TRUVELO (?) etc that measure your speed from two know points (ie bridges where the camera PHOTOGRAPHS your plate and DOESNT use radar/lasr so are undetectable).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T155324Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Got flashed on Saturday. Praying it was out of film. But it made me realise that a camera detector really would be a great investment. Had a look in Halfords but wasn't really sure what to get. Anyone got any recommendations?
I bought a Snooper S1 a few months ago, only used it a few times. Around town its not too clever as it picks up all sorts of other radar signals from traffic lights (not just camera's but the sensors that detect if a car is approaching), supermarket doors etc. i switched it off when I was around town and knew the roads.
I upgraded to a Neo 4 (looked on ebay £100 cheaper than Halfords) a week ago. No false alarms etc. It has GPS built in a knows where the cameras are and alert you to camera's - even around corners. Also picks up lasar (as the S1) and TRUVELO (?) etc that measure your speed from two know points (ie bridges where the camera PHOTOGRAPHS your plate and DOESNT use radar/lasr so are undetectable).
I got it thru Radar Girl and they delivered it within a few days (failed on next day delivery as they forgot to process my order).
Only problem with GPS devices is that you need to update them over the internet/modem and a subscription normally costs a fair few £££.
Good luck,
Rob
Tim,
I've got a road angel, and it's probably saved my liscence at least twice.
Mind you, it's because I got banned for doing 102 mph on the M20, that I
bought it in the first place, and thing ironic thing is, it would have detected that
area as a police hot spot and save me a 1 month ban !!!
But we learn by our mistakes dont we ??
Anyway, simple to use, and updating quite straight forward aswell. I think it's
a bit more expensive than most, but put a value on keeping your liscence !!!!
I have a Road Angel.
Not sure if it's the best, but it is very useful and easy to use.
The best feature is the accuracy of the GPS speed reading. It shows just how inaccurate most car speedos are. Most over-read by quite a big margin, which is probably a good thing.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
