5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 certificate of conformity nox figures.
Leading reported evidence
Check car
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check car' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check car' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I also checked my V5 after reading Paul's post above and it has the following info:
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Good afternoon to all,
In a effort to understand the published figures for the previous generation of 911, I would welcome all and everyone to post or email direct a copy of ,or just list the four emissions g/km figures as printed on your CoC and to which specific model it applies .I.E 1999 996 c2 3.4 coupe automatic. An engine code, type would be useful in addition if you know the type ,such as M96/03 etc.
I would like to be able to compare manual to auto and turbo to 3.4 and 3.6 etc., to understand how the body type and transmission affect the figures if at all?
If I could end up with a handful of each specific model variant that would be enough to establish a pattern if it exists. Anyone that does not have a CoC is entitled to apply for one free to Porsche cars Great Britain and I am willing to help with the form to fill out and sending it off , if that would help.
This is on behalf of the club membership.
All information will be kept in strict confidence, Vin numbers ,registration etc. will not be published.
Christian sanger 993 register assistant.
Christian - from some posts on other forums around this ( or more specifically how it affect the ULEZ charge ) it seems SOME cars ( and at least 1 996 I have read of) have the NOX value on the V5 - in that case the owner was able to email a copy to TfL and have the record updated regarding ULEZ.
I realise this isn't specifically what you asked for but you might get more data if people have it already without needing to get the CoC.
I checked my car on Tfl and it IS compliant. Its a 2003 996 C4. I also checked my V5 after reading Paul's post above and it has the following info:
V.1: CO (g/km or g/KWh) 0.394
V.2: HC (g/km or g/KWh) 0.096
V.3: NOx (g/km or g/KWh) 0.021
V.4: HC+NOx (g/km) 0.090
TfL check is here:
https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/check-your-vehicle/
V.1 CO (g/km or g/kWh): 0.229
V.2 HC (g/km or g/kWh): 0.061
V.3 NOx (g/km or g/kWh): 0.030
V.4 HC+NOx (g/km): 0.091
Here are mine for a manual C2 2004 with M96/03 engine.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
