9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGT2 clutch advice
Leading reported evidence
Use ø108mm cats
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
On 997 turbo's hear nothing but good things on the Europipe full setups and note they run an option which has a 100 cels and cat cross section of ø153mm sport cats is 40% larger than ø130mm cats, 60% larger than ø118mm cats and over 100 % larger than the commonly used ø108mm cats.
Leading evidence: 'Use ø108mm cats' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace clutch' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
In preparation for the increase in power/torque, I intend replacing the clutch.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Has anyone run either of these combinations, and what is your experience regarding clutch take up from stand still, and changing gears?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Different car, but I ditched the 200 cell cats that was offered with my exhaust and running a larger diameter set of 100 cell HJS race cats.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
On 997 turbo's hear nothing but good things on the Europipe full setups and note they run an option which has a 100 cels and cat cross section of ø153mm sport cats is 40% larger than ø130mm cats, 60% larger than ø118mm cats and over 100 % larger than the commonly used ø108mm cats.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
RE:clutch and SMFW, as I only use the vehicle from time to time for events and spend more time cruising around, the small clutch engagement window was the main concern.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
On 997 turbo's hear nothing but good things on the Europipe full setups and note they run an option which has a 100 cels and cat cross section of ø153mm sport cats is 40% larger than ø130mm cats, 60% larger than ø118mm cats and over 100 % larger than the commonly used ø108mm cats.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
After a bit of advice. I am looking to replace the clutch in my 997 GT2. Will be stepping up the power with a tune later in the year, with torque increasing to around 900Nm and power north of 350kw at the wheels. Am also swapping my cats out for a set of 200 cel cats, although leaving the rest of the exhaust stock. In preparation for the increase in power/torque, I intend replacing the clutch.
I am currently looking at retaining the DMFW as I do use it as a road car (not a daily driver) with the odd competitive event (e.g. Racewars). From my time spent researching different options I have narrowed the pressure plate down to a Sachs 88 3082 999 764, which should be good for up to 1000Nm depending on the type of clutch plate. When it comes to the clutch plate I am in a bit of a quandary. As I am staying with the DMFW I do not need a sprung clutch plate, but can I go sintered (e.g. 88 1964 999 838) or should I stay with an organic (e.g. 88 1864 001 098) plate? Or if I go sintered, should I go with a sprung plate even with DMFW?
Has anyone run either of these combinations, and what is your experience regarding clutch take up from stand still, and changing gears? Appreciate any thoughts.
Thanks
One cannot choose a clutch for someone else. It's all personal preference.
Going with a pressure plate with more clamp force will put more pressure on your clutch peddle.
Going with a more coarse friction material will make the clutch feel more "touchy" on/off feel. Also going full face disc is a lot more smoother than a 4 or 6 puck clutch.
For example when i changed my clutch in my 944 turbo, i have a Sachs Pressure plate. (unsure what one but the clamp force felt the same as oem) and my friction material is a Carbon semi metalic full face disc. this supports my 450whp and 800 or so nm. It feels good, more touchy than the oem but i got use to it.
In my car, i wouldn't go for a pressure plate with more clamp force as the peddle is hard enough to push. And the clutch fork is known to fatigue a lot with more clamping force to push open.
So if you can afford to have a stiffer peddle then get more clamping force for a smoother engagement feel. But you'd still need to get a more coarse friction plate depending that the pressure plate is capable of with the stock disc.
Curious as to why you ruled out single mass flywheel (noise, stories of pedal feel put you off?? or both).
I've purchased a Bitsa kit (part numbers below) for my 996tt which coincidently is based on the Sachs pressure plate you have quoted (everything else is factory parts) to compliment some other mods. I thought that Sach's pressure plate is rated at 850nm. . However I understood that bitsa kit holds its own on a modified 997 gt2 as it does on a non stock 996tt.
Pentosin Fluid - 1000ML
00004330574
Pressure Accumulator
99731416600
Pressure Accumulator seal ring
99970722440
Sachs 764 clutch pressure plate (88.3082.999.764)
883082999764
997GT3RS 4.0 clutch disc
99711601391
964 LWFW
96410223931
Flywheel bolts
92810215101
Pilot bearing
93110211100
Throwout bearing
94411608001
Guide tube #3
95011681330
Guide tube bolts #4
99927007001
Ring gear
96411414331
Pressure plate bolts
99951001502
Cross shaft for release bearing fork#5
95011671004
Gasket 13,02 x 16.4
#6
99911341840
Articulated Bush #7
99920133901
Cover #8
95011672500
Articulated Bush #9
99920136501
Retaining bracket #10
95011671302
Heaxagon Head Bolt M6X16 #11
90007505703
Shaft Bush#12
95011671501
Also curious as to what brand / size of cats are you looking at running. Different car, but I ditched the 200 cell cats that was offered with my exhaust and running a larger diameter set of 100 cell HJS race cats. (just a view, but the incremental cost on 100 cel over 200 cel is not that great and may not see the difference in a peak number, but you may yield a better throttle response across the rev range.
On 997 turbo's hear nothing but good things on the Europipe full setups and note they run an option which has a 100 cels and cat cross section of ø153mm sport cats is 40% larger than ø130mm cats, 60% larger than ø118mm cats and over 100 % larger than the commonly used ø108mm cats.
Top US engine builder Jake R recommends not using a SMF/LWFW. I had one in my car the performance was great but the risk (for me) was too high (no harmonic dampening, potential burnt clutch, hard to take off, rattling at idol/in neutral etc).
The recommendation on the disk is if you keep your DMF you need a standard un-spring disk if you go SMF you will need a spring disk. As you move up in power an up-rated pressure plate is required.
Thanks for the feedback all.
Re:cats, staying with 200 cel so as still legal but still allow it to breathe a bit better. Am in process of removing and shipping my cats to Canada to get a custom set made using the HJS core. These are the guys making the cats for me www.unobtainiumwelding.com
RE:clutch and SMFW, as I only use the vehicle from time to time for events and spend more time cruising around, the small clutch engagement window was the main concern. Clutch noise was a lesser worry. Just wanting to ensure I have a combination that can hold the increase in torque and power, while still being able to handle normal driving duties (plus the odd fling down a track).