13 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use car site
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The world has gone mad - it's not like I'll confuse Henry's nice little used car site with an official Porsche GB one.
New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use car site' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace its name' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Use "porsche" in their names have been pressured
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Other Porsche-related businesses using "Porsche" in their names have been pressured to change.
New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Use number
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under??
New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Use number
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under??
New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Yep, there was a crack down about a year ago. Certainly anything with 'Porsche' was taken offline. I'm trying to remember what Rennlist was called before that. It certainly was forced to change its name.
Have a search on the web these days for sites with Porsche in the URL. You'll not find many.
Poor Henry at 911virgin.com had the buggers at Virgin having a go at him as well - a potential two litigants for one domain name? The world has gone mad - it's not like I'll confuse Henry's nice little used car site with an official Porsche GB one.
I suspect they are more concerned with domains with "porsche" in them, than say "911", "944" etc. as 911virgin and 911-classified are still operating.
- I Hope! -
I say this beacuse my site is totally non-profit making and is just a hobby, I'm hardly drawing on the profits of Porsche UK!
>> Edited by pconibere on Tuesday 19th February 12:38
Rennlist used to be called Porschelist, John Dunkel changed it after Porsche AG's lawyers started calling. Other Porsche-related businesses using "Porsche" in their names have been pressured to change. There has been less pressure outside the US, as I understand. I helped set up a UK-based Porsche 928 site called 928UK and we have never been approached for misuse of the Porsche name or trademarks. I think numbers are a little more difficult to enforce trademark rights than actual names.
Actually you cannot copyright numbers at all. This is why Intel had to drop the 486 sucessors intended name of 586 after it clear that you cannot copyright numbers.
Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under??
Regards
Although... the reason why the 911 is called the 911 is because that Peugeout wouldn't let them call it 901, as they 'owned' numbers constructed thus: 'x0x'.
Not massively up on trademark law, but depends on what category you tradmeark under. i.e. I could call my car a Pentium without Intel having a go at me, as it relates to cars not pooters.
To recap, from what I know re a rusty Law degree including Intellectual Property...
1) you can trademark numbers, you can even TRY and trademark a smell or noise!!! (you may not succeed though)
2) the Intel story is most likely to be that someone trademarked 586 in the same category, ie computer chips, and this prevented Intel from subsequently protecting it. However, trademarks are not given if there is potential for passing off and confusion - and many are refused. If a judge ruled that any 'x86' designation was seen by the general masses to be an Intel product, they would not let Acme Computer Chips claim rights over 586.
Hello people,
I am about to launch a new 911 discussion forum, mainly aimed towards UK
owners, but of course everyone is welcome
www.911uk.com
Hope to see you there!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.