fullymatted.
Back to search
PistonHeads

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
13 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNew 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Leading reported evidence

Use car site

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The world has gone mad - it's not like I'll confuse Henry's nice little used car site with an official Porsche GB one.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed work

Replace its name

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It certainly was forced to change its name.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use car site' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace its name' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 13 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Replace its name

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It certainly was forced to change its name.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use "porsche" in their names have been pressured

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Other Porsche-related businesses using "Porsche" in their names have been pressured to change.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use number

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under??

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace its name

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It certainly was forced to change its name.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use "porsche" in their names have been pressured

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Other Porsche-related businesses using "Porsche" in their names have been pressured to change.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use car site

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

The world has gone mad - it's not like I'll confuse Henry's nice little used car site with an official Porsche GB one.

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK

Use number

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under??

New 911 UK forum - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

13 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • PistonHeads: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Carry on using that domain name and you'll have Porsche on your arse. They're very hot on protecting their trademarks.

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Seriously? Have other people been made to give up their domain names do you know?

POST 3Original post

Yep, there was a crack down about a year ago. Certainly anything with 'Porsche' was taken offline. I'm trying to remember what Rennlist was called before that. It certainly was forced to change its name. Have a search on the web these days for sites with Porsche in the URL. You'll not find many.

POST 4Original post

Poor Henry at 911virgin.com had the buggers at Virgin having a go at him as well - a potential two litigants for one domain name? The world has gone mad - it's not like I'll confuse Henry's nice little used car site with an official Porsche GB one.

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I suspect they are more concerned with domains with "porsche" in them, than say "911", "944" etc. as 911virgin and 911-classified are still operating. - I Hope! - I say this beacuse my site is totally non-profit making and is just a hobby, I'm hardly drawing on the profits of Porsche UK! >> Edited by pconibere on Tuesday 19th February 12:38

POST 6Original post

Rennlist used to be called Porschelist, John Dunkel changed it after Porsche AG's lawyers started calling. Other Porsche-related businesses using "Porsche" in their names have been pressured to change. There has been less pressure outside the US, as I understand. I helped set up a UK-based Porsche 928 site called 928UK and we have never been approached for misuse of the Porsche name or trademarks. I think numbers are a little more difficult to enforce trademark rights than actual names.

POST 7Original post

Actually you cannot copyright numbers at all. This is why Intel had to drop the 486 sucessors intended name of 586 after it clear that you cannot copyright numbers. Shouldn't really be a problem, I dont think as they can't stop you using a number under copyright law, so what other angle could it be construed under?? Regards

POST 8Original post

Although... the reason why the 911 is called the 911 is because that Peugeout wouldn't let them call it 901, as they 'owned' numbers constructed thus: 'x0x'. Not massively up on trademark law, but depends on what category you tradmeark under. i.e. I could call my car a Pentium without Intel having a go at me, as it relates to cars not pooters.

POST 9Original post

I thought intel called it the pentium because some clever bugger had already registered 586 before they did?

POST 10Original post

To recap, from what I know re a rusty Law degree including Intellectual Property... 1) you can trademark numbers, you can even TRY and trademark a smell or noise!!! (you may not succeed though) 2) the Intel story is most likely to be that someone trademarked 586 in the same category, ie computer chips, and this prevented Intel from subsequently protecting it. However, trademarks are not given if there is potential for passing off and confusion - and many are refused. If a judge ruled that any 'x86' designation was seen by the general masses to be an Intel product, they would not let Acme Computer Chips claim rights over 586.

POST 11Original post

The intel thing was because they wanted to distance themselves from all the other chip makers .

POST 12 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

... I probably get to keep www.911uk.com by the looks of it then PS Thanks for the comments on the forum.

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hello people, I am about to launch a new 911 discussion forum, mainly aimed towards UK owners, but of course everyone is welcome www.911uk.com Hope to see you there!

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.