14 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHReal World Over Revs - Water World Questions
Leading reported evidence
Replace issues
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
There is obviously the discussions on the money grab down change issues which I think we all agree is the things of nightmares but other than that I wanna debate.
Leading evidence: 'Replace issues' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace issues' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace issues
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
There is obviously the discussions on the money grab down change issues which I think we all agree is the things of nightmares but other than that I wanna debate.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Forum Australia: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T064914Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So im a month into taking water into my diet and I have got forumed out so I wanted ask
Whats your views and beyond the technical mega breakdown that I know is in a GT3 thread…on what defines an over rev.. what do they actually sound and look like.
When a GT3 or other car hits the old rev limiter .. A ) Does it show up in the OBD ..
what do we think is it doing to the engine. Is it such a crime to hit the rev limiter.. I aint got there yet but I sense the urge to stamp and squeeze the throttle a little harder is growing
There is obviously the discussions on the money grab down change issues which I think we all agree is the things of nightmares but other than that I wanna debate.
Im a kinda visceral guy , kick tyres , smell petrol , burn rubber .. excuse the indulgence , I mean I just found out the way to get a comfort fit in the carbon bucket seats is to loose 3 kilos… shit that in the real world meant a lot of broken coffee meetings and bacon roll rendevouzs that I had to cancel
Maybe I can get Skidmakrks to comment he would maybe know about Orange stuff like this
Yeah I ve seen all the tech gobledeygoop .. is this car parenting behaviour in this video considered abusive of the car or not?
Do you clip your kid round the ear or not ?
Im not talking notional controlled crying discussed on a forum Tassie, im talking ring its neck or sit chilled in the corner behind your keyboard debate?
PS the Ducati 1100 Hypermotard in the garage.. is my on my knees pulpit experience every now and then .. I recall calling out the thank God Words in prayer, mist times its ridden.
Plain and simple is the rev limiter and over rev? In ownership measure not OBD configuration land? I think I heard in the VID
Ran out of road..
I believe that just kissing the limiter doesn`t show up as an over rev, having brain fade and holding it there may show as a Range 1 or 2.
Higher range over revs are from downshifting to too low a gear, with your head up your own Bott Bott, and should be avoided at all costs, as the electronics have no control over the mechanical forces applied by Newtons third law.
@symsy
this RS appears to have sequential, so you would think much lower risk of money shift.
Over rev ranges are 250 rpm increments over the engine redline (8400 in your case)
Type 1 - not classed as mechanical
Type 2 and up - mechanical
Those vids are the biz. Yours is too nice. Makes me think you should have bought the ex jim richards RS and just thrashed the fuch out of it!
I use to bounce my 996 on the
trevmc
rev limiter frequently. It's good for the IMS. Splash that oil around. Lube it up good.
Taking it to the limit whle under load would result in very little over rev.
Suddenly unloading the engine while at full throttle and very close to the limit can result in a substantial over rev. This is not inertia but the released energy that still has to complete its cycle and a small ECU delay in calculating the revs.
Take it to the limit as that is what limits are for.
I always assumed rev limiter was protection (unless downshifting stupidly). The GT2 used to rev hard when it came on boost and was redlined in the 6s so it was very easy and common to tag the limiter. Especially when launching hard in first gear. Sounded cool - rat tat tat bouncing off the rock faces on Reefton Spur SMT.......
IMO you want to avoid hitting the limiter as much as possible, if you're buying a 997 it records more data about the over rev than the 996 i.e. there are more ranges.
The ECU records over-revs that can then be read by the dealership or by anyone with a Durametric..
There was this discussion not long ago on here I recall, but have a read of this:
http://www.911virgin.com/porsche/rev-range-information/
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.