fullymatted.
Back to search
Planet-9

Canadian Fuel Consideration- Shell 93 v Petro Canada 94

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCanadian Fuel Consideration- Shell 93 v Petro Canada 94

Leading reported evidence

Use 94 until shell started selling 93

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I used the 94 until Shell started selling 93.

Canadian Fuel Consideration- Shell 93 v Petro Canada 94
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use 94 until shell started selling 93' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 94 until shell started selling 93' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 1 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use 94 until shell started selling 93

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I used the 94 until Shell started selling 93.

Canadian Fuel Consideration- Shell 93 v Petro Canada 94
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Planet-9: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T083035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1Original post

Hi Folks...I had a chat with a local tuner here in Toronto, and while duscissing tune options for the car, they mentioned that the better fuel to go with is the Petro 94, over Shell 93. Their explanation is that originally the Shell formulation "was" superior" but now not as good as Petro 94 (formerly Sunoco). I understand the extra octane number would provide (theoretically) more power, but is it worth it? Shell is the only recognized "top tier" 93 available in Ontario, whereas Petro Canada does not carry that certification. Unless I am mistaken. It is well known that the Shell (and other top tier) fuels have excellent cleaning and detergent properties, which are beneficial to these engines. Question is: would switching to Petro 94 be a good or bad idea? Looking at reliability and longevity for this car...performance boost would only be a bonus if the Petro was equally as "detergented"

POST 2Original post

1 step in octane won't make much of a difference. Assuming it's actually true in the first place (those are lab numbers). I don't think either would make any noticeable difference in the car's longevity or performance, assuming those numbers are correct in the first place. That said, see if one feels better than the other - they likely don't. If they don't, it won't matter. Both Shell and Sunoco are well known brands, and fuel doesn't make THAT much of a difference overall. Unfortunately, no one really tells us lay-people what the detergent levels REALLY are in a fuel. If it meets regulations, that should be good enough in Canada or USA. We do have "top tier" here in the USA, which says it has a little more... if you have that in Canada then go with that. Otherwise, don't worry about it. These cars don't have delicate engines... regular fuel and oil will be perfectly fine for longer than you'll own the vehicle, probably longer.

POST 3Original post

Top tier doesn’t really mean anything in Ontario. It is not a regulated standard. Most companies have decided no longer to pay the company that designates gas as top tier. There are minimum additives required in all gasoline in Canada, including regular. The companies add more detergents to their higher octane fuels. Both Petro Canada and Shell fuels are quality. I used the 94 until Shell started selling 93. A one number octane increase is minimal. It would certainly not provide more power; that’s not what octane does. Increased octane allows for higher cylinder compression- if your engine doesn’t need it (and ours don’t without a 3rd party tune), it does you no good.

POST 4Original post

When fueling I tend to look for Top Tier gas because of the detergents added, but it’s not always readily found. I counter that by adding a bottle of Techron every 2-3 months or so. At one point I was experiencing a slight stumble when pulling away from a dead stop, intermittently. Once under way any increase in acceleration was fine and smooth. Added a bottle of Techron at the next fill-up and after a few drives the stumble disappeared. Now I use it preemptively to keep the engine firing smooth.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.