20 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCan Anyone in Corpus Christie Look at 2007 TT?
Leading reported evidence
Use word "legitimate"
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To use the word "legitimate" when referring to Mr.
Leading evidence: 'Use word "legitimate"' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use word "legitimate"' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
20 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
NOOO!!! DAMMIT!!
At least it's a 997 Turbo.
Although, it might actually be kind of fun having KK in the turbo forum. I mean, they consider me to be an argumentative, 996tt bashing a-hole troll. So, if KK shows up, well, you know . . .
Don't let these guys get wind of your transvestite/ trans-sexual/ transgender ambitions
https://rennlist.com/forums/politics-and-controversy/904530-not-a-993-but-this-guy-is-really-starting-to-****-me-off.html
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://cimg1.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/481x483/c4msqjc_fab1e5cc9143a8b3ed94dbd05db323ced2808e86.jpg
This has got to be one of this idiot's least overt trolling attempts ever. Why the hell would he expect anyone around here to lift a finger to help him though?
To use the word "legitimate" when referring to Mr. Do-you-even-know-where-your-drain-plug-is indicates that either you are trying (badly) to troll us or you have finally discovered the right amount of alcohol to get drunk (which implies there is now none left for the rest of us...).
So which is it? Bad troll or drunk ramblings of a hairdresser?
Only a true sadist would empty the world's alcohol coffers days before the annual family political opinion face palming season.
Now, ask yourself one question: am I that kind of sadist?