8 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 3.6 piston ring gaps
Reported or suspected cause
bore taper & ovality
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'bore taper & ovality' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'bore taper & ovality' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair shops work, by paying employees' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The post above about the dowel/ring issue is a hint at what kind of issues there are when enthusiastic amateurs (like me !) rebuild these engines.
just one of many such potentially disastrous details
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The ring gap issue is just one of many such potentially disastrous details.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The way that most repair shops work, by paying employees on commission, promotes negligence, speedy work, and etc.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
am I correct to assume the JE set doesn't have a dowel?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
8 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi guys
Building a motor at the moment and can't find anything in the workshop manual for ring gaps for new Porsche rings.
Any help would be appreciated
We have discussed this issue here and never came to a definitive agreement. Part of the problem is bore taper & ovality. First you need to measure that very accurately - that too has been discussed here. If any bore is oval or tapered(try the hotter side first ?) ,measuring ring gap is moot.Ditto Scoring. And speaking of rings are you planning to 'pin' the #2 ring ?
One conclusion was to mark/note the specific location of each gap on each piston and reuse the original rings .It seems the rings wear to the bore(to a degree) and rotate to a stable location and then remain there. New rings or muddled old rings will create more blow-by than desirable.
Like so much with the M96 ,it is very exacting in every respect compared to typical engines.And unless you go to Flat 6 school, there are very few ways to learn all the details. The ring gap issue is just one of many such potentially disastrous details. The parts cost of rebuilding and upgrading an M96 is substantial.You will probably find you also need some very expensive,specialized tools/equipment.
When I did mine ,it cost well over $7000. I spent an enormous amount of time researching and only time/miles will confirm if I got it right ! So it was a financial nonsense, but fascinating :-).
These specs do not exist from Porsche. New ring gaps can be anywhere from .014"-.025" out of the box, too.
In my experience, the sweet spot is around .018", but remember that the second rings have anti- rotation dowels. There are two different types of dowels, and two different types of rings that match these dowels. Its imperative that you have matching dowels, and rings.
As Schnell said, almost every bore will need more than just rings, as the taper and out of round factors are a real concern with these engines, even at extremely low mileage points.
We've had some interesting Posts about M96 engine failure after a rebuild. One member had his engine rebuilt twice by a highly regarded Porsche 'expert' in S.California. Of relevance is that this company , despite much hoopla here ,showing their facility full of expensive looking road and race Porsche's is not a Preferred LN IMSB Installer.
The member's engine failed after both rebuilds on the first Track outing . Suggests there was something wrong with the rebuild technique . The post above about the dowel/ring issue is a hint at what kind of issues there are when enthusiastic amateurs (like me !) rebuild these engines. The fact that the amateur has an impressive workshop is irrelevant if the rebuilder does not know ALL these arcane M96 details.And even the self-proclaimed experts like the company above are ignorant of these little details.
So enthusiasts like me spend a large amount of money($7000+) on these engines and it is potentially wasted.This despite great care in technical research . You may get lucky but you are clueless about which details you missed and why they do/don't matter.And there are dozens of such details and quirks.
Now compare the $7000 amateur attempt(like mine) with the cost of getting a used engine or a rebuild by a
real
expert.
I have watched every M96 rebuild video/photo diy/account I could find. The only mention about dowels/pins/rings is this thread and the prior one I mentioned. Trying to discover the complete list is probably impossible outside the M96 Engine rebuild class - which I am unable to attend due to family commitments.
So until the M96 book is published ,I suggest holding off on a diy rebuild.Meanwhile I am just hoping for dumb luck on my rebuild :-).
You can never know it all. The most important 6 inches in the shop is between your eyes.
Most of this is all common sense, paying attention, and situational awareness. Thats how I take things apart when they are brand new, with no manual, and start my manipulation with them. If you pay enough attention, take enough notes, and try your best, you'll succeed.
The most recent enthusiasts level "101" engine class online had Tony and I shocked with the knowledge that the attendees had compared to technicians. Two questions were answered in the last session that have NEVER been answered by a technician correctly in any class. Over 3000 techs have been asked that question over the years, and none have ever gotten it right. An enthusiast nailed it verbatim in 2 seconds.
Remember, its not what the shop knows that counts... Its what they apply. The way that most repair shops work, by paying employees on commission, promotes negligence, speedy work, and etc. The faster the pace, the less is applied.
You won't find a clock here. Not one.