fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Name and shame

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHName and shame

Reported or suspected cause

admin would censor it

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I'd say post it so we all know, but I suspect admin would censor it.

Original post Read captured discussion
Name and shame
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'admin would censor it' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'admin would censor it' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

admin would censor it

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause

I'd say post it so we all know, but I suspect admin would censor it.

Original post Read captured discussion
Name and shame
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Not sure if we can do this, but I was minding my own business in Cambridge yesterday in my Cab and a right prat in a Turbo 996 nearly took my front off because I was in slow moving traffic all merging into one lane and he had a "better" car than mine and wanted me to know it. If you read these threads mate, I think you drive like a pr#ck and judging by the way you drive you have a small one! I have you number and can name and shame if you want me too......... Migration info. Legacy thread was 11592

POST 2Original post

I'd say post it so we all know, but I suspect admin would censor it. Migration info. Legacy thread was 11594

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

L3# FUN Migration info. Legacy thread was 11598

POST 4Original post

Mogsyman Nice one, I'll look out for it - work in Cambs too! Migration info. Legacy thread was 12138

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.