19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHC2 vs C4 width
Leading reported evidence
Replace gt3 into a c2
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I have basically swapped a gt3 into a c2...gt3 shares the c4 chassis.
Leading evidence: 'Replace gt3 into a c2' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'better deal' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace gt3 into a c2' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Now knowing the engine limits, the turbo was probably a better deal..
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
C4S is wider but afaik there's no difference between normal 2 and 4.
So what's actually wider? Are they the same chassis but the 4/4S has just wider rear fenders/body? Are the wheels spaced out wider and actually provide a wider stance? I know the C4S runs a different offset in the rear and has a wider rim. My question is, were the rear fenders widened to accommodate this or was there more work done to the chassis. Working on a C4S before, the engine bay seemed as tight as a C2.
Remember the GT3 is based on the C4 chassis, and is considered a narrow body 911. Only the GT2, Turbo and C4S are wide body variants.
The how is the wider rear fenders for the inter-coolers.
Its just the rear fender skins. The cabin and engine bay measurements r the same inside the structural unibody rails. The area under the rail is bigger to allow for the intercoolers.
The c2 and c4 r the same other then the frunk area to allow fir the awd. The frunk area is identical for the c4, c4s and turbo. I have basically swapped a gt3 into a c2...gt3 shares the c4 chassis. Therfore they r the same.
There r also sheet metal differences around the engine lid for the c4s and turbo too, but the c4 is still the same as the c2 in that area.
Hmm ,,,The C4S gets you the wider rims, wider stance, the look of a turbo and in the day, less cost. Now knowing the engine limits, the turbo was probably a better deal.. LOL
