15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH997.2 Characteristics
Leading reported evidence
Reconnect front shocks while rotating 180 degrees
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Following some advice here online, I reconnected the front shocks while rotating 180 degrees.
Leading evidence: 'Reconnect front shocks while rotating 180 degrees' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'couple of times a year or' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Reconnect front shocks while rotating 180 degrees' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I repeat it whenever I think necessary, probably a couple of times a year or after a
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I was able to change the overall response curve on the
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
On the 987.2 series there is a Porsche published technique to reset the PDK adaptations.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
2 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
I have a 2012 S,
PDK
, 72,000 miles.
What I'm looking for is input from those of you with other sixes, whether
911
or
Boxster/Cayman
.
The reason is that my 99
Boxster
is far smoother, despite the
911
having new motor and transmission mounts. Is the 3.8 just not smooth? And is jerkiness in the drivetrain normal?
Otherwise, I love the driving experience; the handling, braking and general operation.
(The ride less so, in spite of the
DSC
unit, it is still a little harsh but I put that more on the 19" wheels.)
Thanks for any input.
My
Cayman
2.9 engine is smooth. I occasionally reset the throttle body which helps synchronise the throttle action to the
PDK
. This makes changes smoother and reduces jerking.
Turn the ignition to the ‘on’ position but the engine not started, for one minute. Then cycle the ignition off and back on again. Leave it on for 30 seconds. The throttle body can be heard resetting. After this turn it back off and start the car.
You're comparing your 911S, 2012, PDK, 72,000 miles - with your 99 Boxster and questioning how smooth the 911 should be?
How long have you owned the 911? The PDK transmission is an adaptive transmission, it learns how you drive and adjusts it's shift behavior accordingly. Every so often it's worth making it forget the adaptations and start over again, particularly if you're experiencing rough shifts under normal driving conditions.
On the 987.2 series there is a Porsche published technique to reset the PDK adaptations.
Here is what I wrote about that a long time ago in a Galaxy far-away:
Sounds like equine fecal matter when you first read it - but at least on the 987.2 PDK is made a BIG difference. I imagine your 997 uses the same PDK software (with some modifications) - so it's worth a try to see if it helps.
Let us know if it does - or doesn't...
Well, I
am
comparing a 25-year-old engine to one which
should
have improved design characteristics.
Nonetheless, I will try your suggestion, as the price is acceptable!
I did the reset procedures for the first time 2 days ago. Definitely heard the sound C9872 described. It's been raining so I have not driven her since said reset. I didn't think my car shifted poorly but out of curiosity I did it anyway. I will report back on whether I can perceive any difference.
I thought about it while I was driving today, what would I say about the "reset procedure". It's like when Viper says to the top gun class, you're the best of the best, we'll make you better. I wrote it down and put it in my service logs, thanks for the tip C9872.
I am stunned. This worked so well!
Amazing something so simple (and non-intuitive) could accomplish such a result. It's like a transmission transplant.
Next
question: is this a once per year thing, or just when you notice it's getting rough again?
Thanks Don!
My expectation? No difference or such a small difference I'd wonder if it was in my head. My experience? So smooth and no lie, sport felt like sport plus which I didn't try.
Good to hear that it has helped. The first time I couldn’t believe it myself. I thought that all the clunks etc were normal. I repeat it whenever I think necessary, probably a couple of times a year or after a
battery
change.
Update on the ride. Durametric showed no communication with the
PASM
module. The dealer confirmed this. They reset the communication, put the original module back in and the ride is much improved.
Now, the question is if I dare to reinstall the
DSC
module.
Module reinstalled, and took a thousand-mile trip. I don't really feel it softening the ride, so I'm going to attempt to customize and reduce the compression damping through the software.
I was able to change the overall response curve on the
DSC
unit, and while it helped some, there isn't a huge difference. I probably wouldn't be quite so picky, except that M235i my wife has is vastly better in this regard. Comfort is really compliant, and sport is really a good step towards better suspension control.
Overall, I am disappointed.
Additional update--
Following some advice here online, I reconnected the front shocks while rotating 180 degrees. We took a long drive over the weekend and I noted the front end isn't reacting harshly to every bump and is now quite supple. The rear still has a bit of harshness, but there is a clunk back there over bigger bumps. I also see one tailpipe is lower so I'm wondering if the new engine mounts (less than a year old) have failed. Checking that today--after a mandatory wash.
Waze
sent us on about a half-mile of gravel on the return trip.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.