911uk

Suspension time!

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHSuspension time!

Leading reported evidence

Check later

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I think they would be around 10 years old could be wrong I’ve got all the paper work for the car so can check later
Original post Read captured discussion
Suspension time!

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check later' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check later' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check later

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I think they would be around 10 years old could be wrong I’ve got all the paper work for the car so can check later
Original post Read captured discussion
Suspension time!

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Good evening all! Currently got b6 with lowering springs on my 4s. But I’m sure over time it’s got harsher and harsher. Unless I’m getting soft with age! Is there anything tests I can do to double check that it’s either my shocks or potentially my spring that’s died? I was under the car not long ago and didn’t see any leaks from the dampers.

POST 2Original post

Hi Tom do you know how old are the springs and dampers are, and how many miles are on them?

POST 3Original post

How old and what brand of tyres are on the car?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 2807673

I think they would be around 10 years old could be wrong I’ve got all the paper work for the car so can check later

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 2807685

PS4s 3000miles old

POST 6Original post

I’ve found the PS4s are very harsh. Softer sidewalls yet firmer carcass. Not like the old SO2’s

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 2807696

Do you know what date stamps they have on them?

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 2807732

2025 only put them on last may on fronts. Rear are 2025 put them on 2 months ago

POST 9Original post

I hated the B6 on my car, I went from Porsche M030 and found them even harsher. In the end I went with the Koni Special Actives, with M030 springs first and then H&R springs and these dampers were absolutely spot on with both of those. The H&R lowered the car a little more than the M030 but being progressive were a smidge more comfy around town and under 40mph, but then firmed up a bit more when you started to press on. This combined with a thicker anti roll bar and tweaked geo was 911 perfection for me on a road car. I had a few other 911 owners drive it, including 991 owners and all were really impressed with how a car that gripped so well and stayed so flat was so compliant at the same time. I have not managed to get my 997 anywhere near as good yet.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.