33 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBrake Rotor / Pad Recommendation
Leading reported evidence
Replace because of a few track days
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Pads were only 50%, but replaced because of a few track days on the schedule.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So by that definition I'd say yes, it gave fair warning since a routine check by hand threw some warning signs before the car started misbehaving whatsoever.
Leading evidence: 'Replace because of a few track days' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check by hand threw some warning signs' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Every bolt, nut and washer was replaced in the suspension.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The one I replaced felt kind of terrible by hand but gave no signs while driving.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Update: So I changed indy shops because I felt the other guys were being sketchy.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check by hand threw some warning signs
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
So by that definition I'd say yes, it gave fair warning since a routine check by hand threw some warning signs before the car started misbehaving whatsoever.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
33 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
2003 996 C2
There are 58,000 miles on the car.
I replaced F&R pads last year with oem.
Pads were only 50%, but replaced because of a few track days on the schedule.
Fast forward 4500 street miles, 2 autocross and 3 track days.
Two weeks ago had Tech inspection for 2 upcoming track days. Everything looked good.
Second track day, after a lot of maneuvering through track traffic, I started to get a little pulsating at hard braking at end of straights.
RF showed a small 2" diameter dark spot.
From what I learned at track, it might be a heat spot, coming from brake pad heat that can't be desperated quick enough after parking the car from previous session.
Recommended to move the car a couple feet after a few minutes at one spot.
So what are recommended pads and rotors for a street car doing a few track days a year?
Thanks
David
Any old rotor with the right diameter will work. It's just a chunk of metal. Endurance pads tend to work the best for periodic track duty. PFC and Pagid are common recommendations. I prefer PFC. Track pads may squeal and put off more brake dust.
-td
I use Meyle rotors and OE Textar pads. Why? They are CHEAP and reliable. A pair of rotors or an axle's worth of pads are about $100 for either end of our cars. Rotors should last you a couple dozen track days, so that cost is in the noise, and OE pads should last 4-5 track days depending on how you drive.
I would specifically recommend against Ferodo DS2500 pads. I put those on my car last year after hearing great things from other people, and promptly boiled the brake fluid after 5 laps of Watkins Glen. Over the next half-dozen or so track days I used those pads for, they were extremely inconsistent and never gave me the least bit of confidence. I have NEVER had an issue with boiling fluid in any car I've tracked, as I am quite gentle on the brakes. I guess those pads just don't dissipate heat very well. Maybe I got a bum set somehow, but after that experience I will not be giving them a 2nd chance.
Yes, the stock pads wear quicker than a track-specific pad, but they behave extremely predictably, stop reliably every single time, can easily engage ABS, don't squeal on the street, work well at cold temperatures for daily driving, and when they're shot I can put a new set on for a hundred bucks. So why pay $200-300 for a pad that MAYBE will last 2x as long, destroy rotors faster, and not give me any more confidence?
Don't buy Porsche-branded pads. They are just Textar pads with a huge markup for the Porsche logo and part number.
We still have the Pagid Sport Pads for your application. Great pricing on a high performance street pad that can be used for light track use as well.
http://www.paragon-products.com/Pagi.../2405sport.htm
http://www.paragon-products.com/Pagi.../2406sport.htm
Thanks DK
WGI is where I go to for Zone 1 48 event past two years.
I did NJMP Lightning last fall and hope to do a day at Lime Rock this summer.
The guy who techs my car for me, said just about the same thing you did.
I have all the matianence records from new, rotors appear to be original, 14 years old.
Pads were only replaced once prior to the set I put on last year.
The plan now I think should be, replace all rotors and pads , and also I think there is a kit for the clips that go on the pads.
Then another complete flush with high temp fluid.
David
WGI a couple weeks ago
Jason
Thank you for your recommendation.
The product details do not address brake dust for street driving.
Is this the best pagid pad for my application.
Do you offer a complete brake package?
David
Here's my .02 on pads and rotors for your application.
I've used the OEM pads for track use since 2002. I've progressed from novice to the black group fairly quickly. I have moved on to R compound tires, and the car is now a track toy. In that long run, I've used a variety of pads and rotor combos. There are definite advantages and disadvantages to the various choices. The best all around combo for your particular situation still remain the OEM pads and rotors. Perfect for the street by being quiet and produces less dust, and more than adequate for even heavy track usage with dependable, reliable, consistent stopping power even with R-compounds. No need for Porsche branded ones, Textar makes them.
Boiled brakes IMO has really nothing to do with pad or rotor brand. It's more often from outdated brake fluid, or poor quality brake fluid. Use Motul 600 or ATE Blue, or the more expensive synthetics, flushed at least once a year, more often if you track heavily. Some people I know do it before each and every DE weekend.
The pulsating feel you get is from transfer of pad material to the disc, happens due to stopping and parking with the brakes still extremely hot from the track. This can happen with any pad/disc combo. Most track events allow for a full lap at slower speeds after each run to allow for cooling of the brakes to avoid this. Cruise through that lap without braking, cruise to a stop to park and get off the brake quickly, shut the engine off and leave the car in gear to hold it in place. I've had glowing red rotors in some DE events, but never had boiled brakes nor pad transfers.
The brake service pack, with new retaining clips, springs and bar are probably a good idea if what you have is 14 years old.
As always, this is all IMO and hope this helps.
Thanks for the explanation.
I am going to go with the textar pads.
The rotors have a hughe price difference, so I am not sure on which ones.
Also, even though my wheel bearings show no sign of wear, I was thinking of doing them also. Is *** manufacturer of porsche bearings?
ty
David
Really no need to do bearings unless they are showing signs of failure. Jack the car up and spin the wheel by hand. If it makes noise or you can feel vibration or a gritty feeling, replace them. If they are not noisy or vibrating, no reason to get into that.
For the folks saying boiling is down to the fluid and not the pads, yes it's possible. But in my case I bled with the exact same fluid every single track event, had the same rotors, and consistently had problems with Ferodo pads but have never had a problem with multiple sets of Textar pads. Just saying, the variable in that case seems to be the pads.
Some great advice here.Thank you. I am impressed that people aren't just recommending the most expensive options.
Any votes for Akebono ? How would they compare to recommended Textar?
https://www.tirerack.com/brakes/resu...1&autoModClar=
I have used Akebono on my wife's Audi and found them to be amazing for keeping wheels clean, as they produce almost zero dust, but fairly lousy for stopping power, requiring a lot more pedal pressure than the OE Audi pads. I don't have an apples-to-apples comparison with Porsche/Textar pads.
I figured 14 years on the wheel bearing might be pushing it.
I wasn't sure if on a Porsche the wheel bearings give you a fair amount of warning when on the way out.
The one I replaced felt kind of terrible by hand but gave no signs while driving. No noise, wheel did not get warm, nothing. So by that definition I'd say yes, it gave fair warning since a routine check by hand threw some warning signs before the car started misbehaving whatsoever. But, that's a sample set of 1, so maybe not too conclusive!
There's a fair chance of screwing something up when doing this job, so I see no reason to do it preventively. Wait until the bearing makes noise when spun by hand, then replace.
Wheel bearings are sealed. I would say they are not a user serviceable part. They can only be replaced. And, it's a PITA to reomve them. You need special tools and a press. It is possible on some variants to get bearings off without removing the wheel carrier, but in my experience, it's way easier to take the carrier off and use a 12/20-ton shop press. In terms of special tools for the suspension parts, I use a couple flare nut wrenches and flare nut crows feet, ratcheting box ends and a giant torque wrench to get the axle nut torqued down. For the bearing, you need a few adapters for pressing the hub and bearing out and some sort of jig or horseshoe to get things level on the press. Also need a 2-jaw puller or a dremel tool to get the bearing off the hub. Note, that when you remove the hub, the bearing comes apart - with half remaining on the hub. So that needs to be pulled off separately. AND, if you forget to install the bearing plate before you reassemble, you'll ruin the bearing getting the hub off. That is, every time you take the hub off, you need a new bearing. Do be sure you get it all together right the first time.
Personally, I wouldn't replace a wheel bearing until it starts to fail. And I don't actually believe they are a wear part on the Porsche recommended service bulletins.
In terms of cost, bearings are like 90 bucks. Hubs are around $250. Wheel carrier might be $500 or $1500, depending on your car model. You'll need new caliper bolts and a new wheel axle nut as well. Those are like 5 bucks each. If you take it to a mechanic, it'll be a couple hours labor per corner. And then possibly an alignment.
-td
The Ferodo's were boiling your fluid because they are a more aggressive pad and are going to generate more heat. Not because there is something wrong with them.
As for the wheel bearings, I've had to replace 3 in the last year. You can tell by pushing on top and bottom side of the tire with it off the ground and seeing if there is any play. You can also check side to side but on the front that can also be a tie rod. I have a machine shop that charges me $60 if I take them the wheel carrier and a new bearing. I do not replace the caliper bolts with every use as I've probably had the calipers off 40+ times in the past year as well. There is also a video on how to replace the grease in the new bearings with Redline high temp grease. I think it's very good but I haven't tried it yet.
I would not attempt the bearings at my home.
There is a brake / Suspension guy who has worked on our cars for 20 years, not a Porsche Indy, but great mechanic.
He put the Techart Suspension on my 996 2 years ago. Every bolt, nut and washer was replaced in the suspension. Drop links, sway bars, coil springs, struts, bushings,strut mount support.
Drive in, drive out $500.
I believe it was very fair priced.
Going the exact same speeds and braking at the same points would not generate more heat just because of a different pad. Physics. The difference is the pad's ability to *dissipate* that heat, rather than holding onto it and making other things in the braking system get hot.
Anybody that wants to try them is free to do so, I'm just trying to help the community by saying that I tried them and had problems that I have never had with any other pad. Your mileage may vary.
I run textar pads also - including a couple of track days. Sebro rotors up front - and used ate at 1/2 the cost at the rear with good results. Ate2000 fluid. Better bang for the buck than oem and no issues - but if you are hard on the pads you might want to consider switching to pfc or cool carbon specifically for the track day and then back to the street pads ...
I thought I'd put in another of my .02c, this time regarding Ferodo pads.
I use the Ferodo DS1.11. They have a very strong initial bite, and have very good durability. Excellent for DE. They are high friction pads, so yes, they can and do generate more heat. Heat dissipation is a function of the rotors, not the pads. Specific driving techniques to help cool the rotors also help. With the increased heat generation from high friction performance pads, you'll need high heat brake fluid as well, and flush them regularly. The standard brake fluid you would use with street pads are more likely to boil when you use high heat high fraction racing pads. Ferodo DS1.11, like any other high heat high friction racing pads, do make a lot of noise when cold, you sound like a POS schoolbus on the streets, so I wouldn't recommend them for mostly street driving. Didn't want Ferodo to get a bad rep, so I thought I'd share my experience.
This is what was explained to me at the track. The new high tech pads, not the pad but the steel plates, have costings or finishes that make disipating the heat more difficult.
I use Ferodo pads as well and have never had any problem with boiling fluid. They give me a lot more confidence with braking, much less fade than OEM pads. Some squeal on the street though.
Okay...lots of issues going on here!
When you step on your brakes, the kinetic energy from the spinning brake disc is turned into heat. The amount of heat generated is a function of how fast the disc is spinning (your car's speed) and the mass of the object in motion that is being slowed (your car's weight). The pad compound doesn't really play into that equation.
Where the pad comes into play is the
transfer
of the heat that is generated. Some pad materials are better conductors than other pads, and some are better insulators. Racing pads tend to have a higher metal content than organic street pads, which gives them a higher max operating temperature before they melt and fade. The pad with the higher metal content will conduct that heat back into its backing plate more readily, which puts more heat into your caliper pistons and fluid.
All Ferodo Racing pads actually use a special thermal underlayer near the backing plate on their pads to slow the transfer of heat into the pistons and fluid. That underlayer is essentially just an insulator to slow the transfer of heat and prevent fluid boil.
The bigger issue at hand is any given pad's maximum operating temperature (MOT). A brake dyno evaluates a pad's coefficient of friction (mu) across a temperature range. If you look at a brake dyno plot for a given brake pad, there is a temperature at which that pad compound shows a dramatic drop in its coefficient of friction. What that translates to in the real world is commonly referred to as pad fade. That means you step on the brakes, and the pedal feels hard, but the car doesn't slow as you would expect. The pad got so hot that the materials are physically breaking down, and it can no longer generate friction. What usually happens at that point is that the pad melts, smears, and sticks all over the disc creating uneven pad deposits, which lead to judder/vibration, and generally inconsistent performance from that point forward.
Race pads are designed specifically with a high MOT. They keep generating friction at track temps, and they don't break down and smear all over the discs. Many times they also don't generate much friction until they get some heat in them. Squeal, dust, etc. are not of concern. Street pads are the opposite however. They're designed to generate friction when cold and not make noise. They have a much lower MOT however, and will melt, smear, etc. far easier than race pads when taken on the track. When we run simulations on our brake dyno, we'll many times take pads up to the 1800F range before they start to fade. An OEM or OEM-style pad may only make it to 1100F before hitting their MOT however.
When shopping for a track pad, your primary concern should be MOT. Will the pads handle the conditions you're throwing at them without fading, melting, and potentially destroying your discs? On a Miata, one doesn't need a pad with an extremely high MOT, because the car/brakes don't generate much heat. The mass of the car is low, and the speeds from which it is stopping are low. The conversion of spinning disc energy to heat is therefore relatively low, and the pads don't need an extraordinarily high max operating temperature assuming the discs have enough thermal mass and airflow to work properly. A Porsche 911 is a different story however. It is heavier, but more importantly, it is carrying much higher speeds into a brake zone. As such, much more heat is being generated, and the pads need to be able to handle that heat. While I'd wholeheartedly recommend the Ferodo DS2500 for a miata under just about any conditions, we would NOT recommend them for a 911. The Ferodo DS1.11 would be a far better choice due to its higher MOT.
Also keep in mind that track layout, tire choice, engine power, braking style, etc. all impact the demands placed on the brakes. So what works for one person on Roebling Road or Willow Springs on street tires, may be destroyed very quickly on Watkins Glen or Road America on R Compound Tires...very different brake demands!
Here are a couple videos we did on brake upgrades. They discuss some of these issues and you may find them useful:
You Tube
You Tube
The Pagid Sport pad will certainly dust less than a race pad but it will dust. I'd still consider it to dust less than many pads available. I've used them on one of my early 911's with very good results. We can build and type of brake package you like...pads, rotors, sensors etc.
If you mean HP+, be ready for ear-piercing squeal on the street.
If you mean HPS, it's really not suited for track use and may fade towards the end of a session and wear pretty quickly.
This is based on my experience using them on a B5 Audi S4. Have not tried them on the 911.
I just had these fitted. A tiny bit bigger than OEM too, as well as lighter.
I use PAGID pads too.
http://www.girodisc.com/Girodisc-Fro...de_p_6547.html
Thanks. I�ve had some pulsing and visible pad wear. Especially after spirited driving and track days. Last time was so dramatic I had it checked out at my Indy. Turns out the pads were very low, and wouldn�t pass regional PCA requirements for track day.
Having driven manual all my life I�m now in a PDK. I viewed P as good to use when stopping and don�t put parking break on even after track or hard road driving. In a manual I�d just shift into first and kill the engine. My mistake is I�ve been leaving it in P. Maybe a Hangover from that manual shift to first. Similar physical motion. I should be leaving in D, it seems.
Pads only lasted 7,000 miles. Only one track day. And one particularly hard driving 1,000 mile road trip. Plus some lovely but ultimately chill back country and touring driving.
Update: So I changed indy shops because I felt the other guys were being sketchy. When the new show checked the pads they were NOT OEM like the prior shop had claimed. So unless the supplier did something different, who knows. Turns out the sensors were melted. I still can't imagine it was my driving. As much as I'd love to think highly of myself I can't be pushing the car that close to its limit.
New pads seem ok. Not as much driving for the past few years w/ COVID
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.