6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHYet another insurance thread
Leading reported evidence
Replace their policy
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace their policy' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check before taking my word' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Can I suggest that caution needs to be used when dealing with some of these "Mass-Market" budget insurance companies...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Id check before taking my word on it though........
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Insurance profile: 49 yrs old, full protected NCB, 6 points, everyday drive with some business use, SL6 postcode, garaged.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T165639Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
It must have been at least a month since one of these threads has appeared. My brother has a '99 996 C4 insured with Liverpool Victoria, and their renewal quote has just come in at £400 more than last year's premium (£800->£1200). "It's a change in our rating for this model" say the insurance company. I am also with LV, so fear the worst at renewal in November.
Anyone had any good quotes recently? Insurance profile: 49 yrs old, full protected NCB, 6 points, everyday drive with some business use, SL6 postcode, garaged.
Thanks,
Richard
try Privilage on line you fill out a form and get a quote there and then but they move on a dailiy bases got mine for £620 98 C4, i have 3 points full no claims bonus car is garged in a rural location, and i am 32 also have a named driver, i hope that helps.
Phil
Can I suggest that caution needs to be used when dealing with some of these "Mass-Market" budget insurance companies...
This thread contains some information on what may, or may not be covered...
http://www.porscheclubgbforum.com/tm.asp?m=110133
Definitely worth asking what is actually covered, and what would be paid out on, in the unfortunate event of a claim.
Richard, be aware that if any of parts fitted to the car non standard eg (above base spec) LV will no longer be covering you on your next premium. Id check before taking my word on it though........
They have changed their policy. No parts except wheels and disability aids will be insured, also they dont cover trackdays now either
Do a search on here for LV and on other porsche forums and you will find out the facts
Try Lancaster. I have a classic policy with them but i know they have regular policies also. Very nice people, good quality of cover and reasonable. I pay £700, i'm 28 and any modifications are allowed as long as they are informed.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
