14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Member! Need opinions on buying 1st 911
Leading reported evidence
Clean bill of health
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You'll want a clean bill of health before you buy and as there are plenty of these cars available you can be particular about which car you buy.
Leading evidence: 'Clean bill of health' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean bill of health' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
BTW test drive nice air cooled ones to get a taste of those too.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Pelican Parts: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello! I've been lurking and reading for awhile, but decided to finally join in the fun.
A bit about myself: I'm a big car guy, building 60s/70s American muscle cars as a hobby, I'm an electrical engineer as my profession. I've always been an admirer of European auto scene, Porsche being at the top of my list, but have never gotten my feet wet with them yet. So, I've decided to buy my first Porsche! I've been reading a lot about all the issues with the M96 motors, 996 buyers guides, etc.
I've narrowed my search to two, I'd like to know what you all think:
1999 C4 coupe, black/black
64k miles
6sp (original clutch)
single owner
clean carfax
Nice paint/interior
Tires 50%
Engine feels strong
Minor rear valence ding, windshield stone crack
Xenon headlights, power seats
At independent dealer (lots of Z06s, Audi's, Mercedes, etc.)
Hair above $21k
1999 C2 Coupe, Silver/black
85k miles
6sp (clutch replaced at 65k)
2 owner (he bought it at a year old)
Carfax unknown, but he says he's kept up the service intervals (need invoices)
Excellent paint and interior
Tires 50% or better (haven't seen it in person yet)
Private seller
$17k, might try to take it a little lower.
Of course, I will still do a PPI with the one I choose to pursue.
What do you think?
I posted a few picts. In one, you can see my '70 Mustang Mach1 I drove to go Porsche shopping! Lol!
Also, is can you tell how much clutch is left by how far the pedal travels before it grabs? The C4 grabs with the pedal way off the floor.
TIA everyone!!
I am leaning towards the c2 if the owner can provide invoices. Yes the c4 has fewer miles but unless the dealer has the service receipts you have no clue if fluids were changed at required intervals.
Also the c2 has a new clutch and that's a savings right there of what $2,000?
But you should drive both to see how you like the handling on each.
Whereabouts are you at?? From the pictures, it looks like you're looking at CA cars. If in the Bay Area, there's a guy local selling a 2000 996 for $17K. It's supposed to need nothing and ready to drive. I have no affiliation.........I'm just passing along the info. I will email the info to you in a PM.
Good luck!
Thanks for all the input guys.
Yes, I'm in CA. I'll take a look at the PM, thanks for that!
Although, I found an '01 that's pretty amazing. I'll post some picts and info soon.
Once again, No affiliation.........but there's a '99 with 60K miles and less than 38K on new motor for sale at $19,900 obo. Looks like the owner may be interested in trading for a street rod too. PM sent with the info.
The Porsche used car mantra is "Buy the newest car you can afford". All the 996's had rear main seal issues of varying degrees from a small leak to total failure. D-chunking of the engine, where a "D" shaped hunk of the lower cylinder shoulder cracks off and winds up in the engine was also an issue in many of the early cars, '98-'99, which was corrected on the '00 and beyond engines. Coolant tank cracks on the pre -'03 cars and poor sealing of the coolant tank caps is still an issue with even the 2008 models due to poor design in my opinion.
I would strongly suggest you have a pre-purchase inspection (PPI) done by a pro who knows Porsches and knows what to look for. You'll want a clean bill of health before you buy and as there are plenty of these cars available you can be particular about which car you buy. As for me, I owned a 2001 Boxster, purchased new, drove it 7 years and had no major issues with it. Traded it in on a '07 C4S, also purchased, new and have been very happy with it. I love these cars warts and all.
Doing your homework before you buy can save you lots of $$'s and big headaches in the long run. Good luck with your search.
Did you see this '03 for sale on the forum?? Looks like the owner just reduced the price to $23K.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=491313
Need more info.
The one with out any nicks and complete service records probably nicer. If someone got it after that they may or may not have done what the car needed as far as fluid changes.
If you can, know your seller (be it an individual or dealer who knows PO).
BTW test drive nice air cooled ones to get a taste of those too.
Regards
