4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHEscort 9500ix Deal
Leading reported evidence
Install mirror mount and wired it into the fuse box
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I installed a mirror mount and wired it into the fuse box.
Leading evidence: 'Install mirror mount and wired it into the fuse box' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install mirror mount and wired it into the fuse box' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If a LEO is sitting in that same area running radar it will still alert you.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I may be wrong, but I don't believe many police use K band anymore anyway (probably because of the interference from these same systems and that the newer technology such as laser is better).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I may be wrong, but I don't believe many police use K band anymore anyway (probably because of the interference from these same systems and that the newer technology such as laser is better).
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I ran across this on Woot! today. It's the same radar detector that I run in my car. I've been really pleased with it. I particularly like the GPS function that tags recurring detections like door openers on commonly driven routes, such as on the way to work, and silences them automatically after 3 occurrences. The next time you drive through it won't go off. If a LEO is sitting in that same area running radar it will still alert you.
The only downside is one that I believe all detectors are facing. The collision avoidance radar on some newer high end cars will set it off. This is limited to a pretty short range. I find this to be a minor irritant and am still pleased with the detector.
This runs $350-$400 pretty much everywhere, so I think it's a good deal.
Anyway, the site isn't mine. I'm not making commission. I just thought some of you might be interested.
http://www.woot.com/offers/escort-pa...ser-detector-5
I've got the built-in version in my car, plus an additional laser jammer/diffuser. It came with the car or I probably wouldn't have spent the $$ to buy it and have it installed. The built-in version of the radar detector alone is $1,995, plus install. So, to get basically the same protection for $300 is pretty sweet.
As for the collision avoidance systems, it seems to me like every freaking semi on the road sets mine off, so I assume it is some sort of similar system. I noticed that they are all K band, so I just shut off all of the K band warnings from the detector. I may be wrong, but I don't believe many police use K band anymore anyway (probably because of the interference from these same systems and that the newer technology such as laser is better). Long story short, I really like having the protection.
Last thing, I was just reading the owner's manual for the laser jammer/diffuser a couple of days ago. I noticed an On/Off switch for it on the console, which I thought was odd. Turns out that when you get the warning that you are getting hit with laser, the jammer/diffuser will protect you, but you must slow down immediately and switch the jammer off so that the officer can get a good reading on your car. Otherwise, he will know you are running a jammer. Hmmm, takes me back to my Navy flying days and some of the stuff we had on our aircraft. Don't ask me for more deets, though, or you know:
