15 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWheel Refurb Lepson's Wolverhampton
Leading reported evidence
Use wolverhampton branch not gillingham
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use wolverhampton branch not gillingham' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check wheels over' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
They offered no opportunity to check the wheels over..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Hi just a heads up for anyone thinking of using Lepsons in Wolverhampton to refurb your wheels..
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T190023Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi just a heads up for anyone thinking of using Lepsons in Wolverhampton to refurb your wheels.. I picked these up this morning this is what you get for £820........
Lepsons are supposed to be the top boys.. Thats who Chris formally of Exel Wheels used... Disappointed is an understatement.. I used the Wolverhampton branch not Gillingham.. And can I just add what a total crap hole Wolverhampton has become.. Thats coming from someone that lives in the West Midlands
I think they have shown there level of workmanship and customer service... They offered no opportunity to check the wheels over.. It was a park the car by the side door.. and we'll bring them out to the car.. I'll call them tomorrow but I feel I know already who I'm dealing with...
I don't know who these people are but the price you paid is asinine regardless of outcome, I'm sorry to say. For stuff that is brand agnostic it's often better to not browse Porsche forums as there are unfortunately quite a lot of porsche owners that are very easily parted with their money. A trusted detailer can perhaps help you with a local referral for refurbing wheels, that's how I got one anyway.
The unit is in an old factory estate with no parking.. I stopped outside the door and I paid in reception and was then told to drive around the side where a guy opened a door and put the wheels straight into the back of the car.. I thought obviously wrongly they had a very good reputation.. As Chris of Exel Wheels used them..Ive emailed them the photos.. Not sure if that goes to the Gillingham or the Wolverhampton branch.. I will be calling them in the morning.. Its a total disgrace
Lepson's in Wolverhampton... Manny was the guy I felt with.. The original quote was £880... When I picked the wheels up I paid £820
Invoice attached... Ive only shown the damage the wheels faces don't look great either.. BBS Sport Classic 2's
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
