fullymatted.
Back to search
Pelican Parts

Rear Spoiler

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRear Spoiler

Leading reported evidence

Recommend heading over

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you have more questions (and you should have) I'd recommend heading over to Rennlist.com.

Rear Spoiler
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Recommend heading over' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend heading over' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Run away

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Well, if it's misfiring it will probably just need a coil pack or a sensor, but I'd personally run away from any seller who would allow potential buyers to drive his 996 with a misfire.

Rear Spoiler

Set per season)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

That's not to say that owning a 996 will be cheap....you've still got to maintain the cars (they eat rear tires at a rate of 1 set per season) but they're no better or worse than any other high performance car in this respect.

Rear Spoiler

Test drove 1 (it was a c4)

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

We've only test drove 1 (it was a C4) that missed when was cold and smoothed out as it warmed up.

Rear Spoiler
Frequently discussed actions (4)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Recommend heading over

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

If you have more questions (and you should have) I'd recommend heading over to Rennlist.com.

Rear Spoiler

Run away

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Well, if it's misfiring it will probably just need a coil pack or a sensor, but I'd personally run away from any seller who would allow potential buyers to drive his 996 with a misfire.

Rear Spoiler

Set per season)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

That's not to say that owning a 996 will be cheap....you've still got to maintain the cars (they eat rear tires at a rate of 1 set per season) but they're no better or worse than any other high performance car in this respect.

Rear Spoiler

Test drove 1 (it was a c4)

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

We've only test drove 1 (it was a C4) that missed when was cold and smoothed out as it warmed up.

Rear Spoiler
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Pelican Parts: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'am new at this as you will soon see, but does the rear deck lid on the 1999 911 open into a rear spoiler? Thanks

POST 2Original post

it should. Press the switch on your fuse panel.

POST 3Original post

Not sure if you actually have a car or not, but when you hit 70 mph it will raise up automatically and you should *just* be able to see it in your rear view mirror.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I don't have a car yet. I've been trying to educate myself on the 1999 911 models. We've been looking at a carrea 4 and it seems theres a lot electronics (PSM) and AWD with this car. Where would I look to find out how reliable this model is? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks again

POST 5Original post

The Pelican 996 board isn't particularly active unfortunately. This is where the aircooled guys hang out. You'll find what you're looking for over at Rennlist.com. In a nutshell though, the 996 are solid well built Porsches. Electronics are not a big problem at all, unlike some other German cars. Brakes, suspension, clutches, nd teh six speed gearboxes are all good, great even, the mechanical bits are all typical Porsche stuff which has been developed and evolved over the years. Certainly the rear spoiler is nothing to think about, much less worry about. The 996 series cars do have a fatal flaw though, and that is the engines. With the introduction of the 996 and 986 (Boxsters) came a brand new engine design for Porsche. This was a water cooled flat six and it was totally unlike the air cooled flat sixes that came before. The engine is known as the M96, and in 2009 Porsche finally replaced it with their next generation motor which designation I can't recall at the moment. A lot of the early M96 motors suffered from bad castings which weeped oil, all generations of M96 motor were susceptible to catastrophic intermediate shaft failures. Some early cars also failed due to the cylinder wall failing. Articles, book, websites have been dedicated to the M96 motors and their various isues so I won't go into a lot of detail here. That's all the bad news. The good news is that most of the motors are fine and as they get older we are seeing M96 motors making well in excess of 100,000 miles. The motors are lively, make great power, they're light and are easy to service. I've just bought y second 996 because I like and trust them more than the air cooled cars. The cars are easy to drive, they'll basically drive circles around the older cars, they look good. They're a nice modern 911. So...buy carefully and you will not be disappointed. That's not to say that owning a 996 will be cheap....you've still got to maintain the cars (they eat rear tires at a rate of 1 set per season) but they're no better or worse than any other high performance car in this respect. If you have more questions (and you should have) I'd recommend heading over to Rennlist.com. Cheers

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

This is the info i was after. That engine thing had me scared, wondering, and this helps a little. Any other tips you have will help. We've only test drove 1 (it was a C4) that missed when was cold and smoothed out as it warmed up. It may be a sensor according to pelican parts. Other than that, i really liked the car. NOW, we want to drive a 2wd and see what that feels like. Thanks, Ron

POST 7Original post

Well, if it's misfiring it will probably just need a coil pack or a sensor, but I'd personally run away from any seller who would allow potential buyers to drive his 996 with a misfire. Shows he either doesn't have a clue about maintenance, or he doesn't have the money to maintain the car. Either way...it probably wasn't maintained well. Caveat Emptor.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

He has to pay the price. Thanks Ron

POST 9Original post

I'll only add that I have a 2000 996 and love it. I've had it for three years now and it's been my daily driver. I've put 57,000 miles on it in that time, and it's been basically trouble free. It now has 86,000+ miles on it and gives absolutely no indication that it is anything other than perfectly healthy and VERY strong and smooth. The engine is a joy. It has a nice fat powerband and loves to rev. Heck, it feels as smooth as a turbine and feels as if it would rev to 8000+ RPM if given the chance. Good luck with your search.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.