10 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThird-Party Warranty - Good Idea? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Use aa/rac i would
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I wouldn't use the AA/RAC I would use a Porsche specific one.
Third-Party Warranty - Good Idea? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Use aa/rac i would' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use aa/rac i would' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I wouldn't use the AA/RAC I would use a Porsche specific one.
Third-Party Warranty - Good Idea? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Use such a warranty
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Third-Party Warranty - Good Idea? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Use third-party warranty company
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Anyone used a third-party warranty company to cover their Porsche?
Third-Party Warranty - Good Idea? - Page 1 - Porsche General - PistonHeads UK
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
It is not quite *so* important that your warranty is watertight/in existence if the Porsche is a 'common' one, because:
1) most-expensive bits will be engine and box, and these will be available at breakers quite readily (ie Scottster quoted 3k for a varioram 993 engine which is a bargain) - Douglas Valley breakers have tons of Porshce parts
2) there are lots of servicing specialists, so rebuilds of engines etc may be cheaper than for more exclusive marques
3) there are many factor parts available for Porsches - if your headlamps go on a 944 for example, you can get Bosch VW Golf headlights of same spec for much less money - a broken Ferrari headlight unit (for example) would be much steeper.
That said, for under 300 quid a year, that is pretty damn good whatever the car.
Rgds
Domster
>> Edited by domster on Wednesday 10th April 17:12
only problem with third party warranty is that they do not cover items that are damaged as a consequence of use. Which in turn usually results in disallowing any claims for anything that is damaged as a consequence of another item that is damaged through use. I think that warrantydirect have removed this clause from the policy so should be okay, but generally everyone I spoke to from the motor trade reckon that third party warranties are not worthwhile. But for £300.00 you could find out for yourself and lose very little if they do end up being useless (assuming you ever need to make a claim). £300 isn't alot of money for the lesson you'll learn anyhow!
Not sure if this is too late, but I would rather spend the money on a good inspection. You are almost guaranteed to make the money back in either cost savings (from get broken things fixed), or from being able to negotiate the price down as a result of the findings.
Not too late at all UV. I've yet to buy the Boxster described above. I'm in research mode.
(I'm hoping for a July purchase, although it may be October - depending on available funds.)
On the subject of inspections (I guess we're talking the AA/RAC kind), has anyone used them? I can imagine a scenario where I go look at a (private sale) car, like what I see and call up to book an inspection. "The first slot we have is two weeks on Tuesday, sir. Can I take your credit card number?" Needless to say, the seller isn't going to be keen to hang around. Or are they actually quite swift?
>> Edited by ianpicknell on Thursday 11th April 08:48
Ian, if the seller isn't prepared to wait for an indepedent inspection, then it should ring alarm bells quite quickly, and walk away.
If you lose the car, then you'll get over it. There's plenty more fish in the sea, unless you want a particular colour/trim combo (as per the missus who wanted Arctic with red leather - luckily we didn't have to wait long)
I wouldn't use the AA/RAC I would use a Porsche specific one. There are a few advertised in 911 & Porsche world.
I really can't advise these strongly enough. They always pay for themselves many times over. I would always use one for a private sale and also if buying from an independent garage. Independents never service the car until they have a buyer and then they only do obvious stuff or things that you have pointed out.
And what’s the worst that can happen, you spend £300 to find there is nothing wrong with the car at all. How about that for value for money
That makes sense, thanks for the tip.
I've just back-ordered Issue 92 (Nov 2001) which, in addition to hopefully having the ads you mention, includes "The Boxster Challenge" article. ("Peter Morgan, himself the owner of a 1999 2.5-litre model, joined Official Porsche Centre AFN for a morning at the wheel of all the current Boxsters - and, in the passenger seat next to racer Tommy Erdos, the ride of his life"). Sounds fun.
Gotta agree with UV here, don't touch the AA/RAC inspections (wouldn't use one for a Fiesta let alone a Porker) - they are crap, and don't understand what's 'really' important to look out for on a Porsche.
Exapmle: A friend of mine at work bought a Ford Focus (trid to talk her out of it, but hey, some people just can't be educated) and she had the AA inspection. They didn't even pick up on the fact that it had panels changed because they had been done properly by an official garage.....I'm sorry to disagree but I'd like to know if my cars had an accident even if the bloody thing was flown back to Deutschland and bolted back together by Ferdinand himself!!
Anyone used a third-party warranty company to cover their Porsche?
I've just had a quick look on-line and am seeing some wildly different quotes. The example car I used was a 1998 Boxster 2.5 with air con, 20-30K miles on the clock doing under 30K per year.
www.warrantydirect.co.uk
quote £261.25 per year
www.easycover.com
quote between £787.50 and £976.50 (depending on cover)
www.warrantywise.co.uk
quote £311.00
There are obviously going to be differences in what each company covers, and I really haven't looked into this in detail. (Warranty Direct limit any single claim to £5,000; how much can go wrong with a Boxster that's gonna cost more than £5,000?)
I read somewhere (don't recall where) that although Boxster's (and Porsche's in general) are reliable, if they
do
go wrong, you want to make sure that someone
else
is paying.
So, anyone use such a warranty? A good idea or a waste of money?
Ian.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.