fullymatted.
Back to search
911uk

Imports

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHImports

Leading reported evidence

Clean import - i.e

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

i reckon a sqeaky-clean import - i.e.

Imports
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Clean import - i.e' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean import - i.e' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Clean import - i.e

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

i reckon a sqeaky-clean import - i.e.

Imports
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 911uk: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm looking to buy a 996 (C2 or C4) and was expecting my budget to stretch to a 1999/ T reg car. Today I went to see an X reg C4 (2001 model) which matched almost exactly what I was looking for, except I found out while I was there, that it was originally imported. The slightly improved 2001 spec and the fact it's a newer car appeals but I can't decide whether the importing is an issue or not. Anyone have any views? It looks like I can get a UK warranty on it from Porsche so should be covered from that side, which makes me feel more comfortable about it. I've also seen a T reg C2 996 (sub 20,000 miles) which I like but it doesn't have the traction control. Does the traction control make a huge difference? Again, any views? Thanks..... Jules Migration info. Legacy thread was 17877

POST 2Original post

i reckon a sqeaky-clean import - i.e. with all correct paperwork - should be fine so long as all history is pukka. pay 3 grand less for it than it's UK counterpart and be prepared to value it similarly at disposal. Migration info. Legacy thread was 17880

POST 3Original post

Hi jay jay Which country did it come from? Migration info. Legacy thread was 17886

POST 4Original post

Imports.... If its a uk spec car where is the problem? Some Dealers will crab it , but not to the tune of three k in my experience, but some will crab anything. Various official Porsche centers will buy and sell imports, so there is no problem with the car all things being equal. Plus when you sell, the car will be older and the older it is the less important which country supplied.....plus as time goes on so a parallel import becomes much more commonplace. Treat the purchase as you would any 996. Traction control, well its not a significant factor in value, some people with it will recommend, but if you are not a heavy footed hooligan you should be just fine. Buy the best condition you can find for your money and consider taking a Porsche warranty. Good luck, Adrian Crawford. www.performance2and4.co.uk www.911secrets.com Migration info. Legacy thread was 17887

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.