Best fuel for Boxsters...not always 93? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

I had a Porsche dealer tell me that I should only run 93 octane fuel if I drive the car hard. He said it can actually be bad to run 93 due to it being a slow burning fuel and can lead to major carbon build up IF DRIVEN "SOFT." Like my friends that previously owned the vehicle, I have only put 93 in it. I heard Shell is a highly recommended 93...... Opinions please?

Mad Scientist Lil B can break it down for you like a &*$%& Exxon chemist yo'. Myself, what that guy told you sounds like marketing speak, to believe what he's saying suggests that lower octane fuel would cause less buildup but premium fuels usually have the greatest detergency. Either way to suggest octane has a correlation to wear sounds like if anything he has it in reverse. The cars run smoother with higher octane.

As I was summoned, maybe I can explain. The burn rate has nothing to do with the octane. Your dealer is wrong. Any car, using any octane fuel, will carbon up if driven 'gingerly', but we're talkin' lil ol lady style here, not normal street driving at legal speeds. This is because the fuel is not completely burned. Incomplete combustion prevents carbon from combining with oxygen to form CO² and leaving the engine through the exhaust. Instead, it remains to foul the valves, plugs and oil. And there's LOTS of carbon - 80% of every gallon of fuel is carbon - about 5 lbs./gal. ! Octane is simply a rating assigned a fuel mix. It is the point where the fuel will spontaneously combust due to being compressed, compared to a 'known' combination of 2 of the components of gasoline - Octane and Heptane. Low octane fuel will spontaneously combust under less pressure, whereas higher octane fuel can withstand greater pressure before it too spontaneously combusts. Lower octane fuel usually (but not always) actually contains more energy because some of the actual gas is replaced by octane boosting chemicals in the higher octane fuel mixes. And, lower octane fuel (because of it's greater % of actual gasoline) also usually contains more carbon. It's a popular misconception that higher octane fuel is somehow ' better ' than lower octane fuel. This probably comes from the fact that higher octane fuel has mostly been labled as 'Super', 'Premium' or 'High Test' which are just marketing phrases. It's not 'better' at all, just DIFFERENT - intended for different applications - if you don't need it, it's not at all better. The Boxster engine is a high compression engine with a compression ratio of 11:1. This is very high, especially compared to a Honda Civic with a CR of 9.8:1, or most production cars which have a cr in the 7.1:1 - 8.5:1 range. Jaguar once made a head which created a 14:1 cr, but this was later reduced to 12:1 for production models due to reliability issues. 12:1 is about the highest you'll see in a production engine. After 14:1, there is no fuel with an octane rating high enough to prevent detonation and you're getting into the realm of diesel engines which actually use compression, not a spark plug, to ignite the fuel. These are usually in the 20:1- 22:1 range. A little side note: Compression ratio is just a comparison of the volume of the cylinder at the bottom of the piston stroke vs the volume of the cylinder when the piston is at the top of it's stroke. As a simple example, let's say a cylinder has a volume of 1000cc at the bottom of the piston stroke and a volume of 100cc at the top of it's stroke. This means the gasses (air/fuel) have been compressed tenfold and the cylinder is said to have a 10:1 compression ratio. Well, when you compress a gas, you also heat it. At some point, this gas can get hot enough to ignite and burn uncontrollably, as in before the spark plug tells it to burn. So, in order to control this, the fuel must resist combusting until compressed to the smallest volume possible but not burn until it gets the added energy of the spark. This is done to release and capture the maximum amount of energy from the given volume of fuel and air. It's also why higher compression engines need higher octane fuel - to reduce igniting uncontrollably under pressure. A high compression ratio is desirable because it lets a motor extract more chemical energy from a given mass of air and fuel due to its higher thermal efficiency and turn it into mechanical energy. High cr's place the available oxygen and fuel molecules into a reduced space and add the 'adiabatic' heat of compression. This creates better mixing and atomization of the fuel droplets. This is good because the fuel is just ready to ignite as the piston approaches it's topmost position where it allows increased power at the moment of ignition and the extraction of more useful work from that power by the expanding of the hot gasses. In the small amount of time allotted (about .002 - .004 sec.), you want the fuel to burn completely so all it's chemical energy is released. If not, some 'energy' ,in the form of unburned fuel is wasted, being expelled from the cylinder during the exhaust stroke.

That last thread is pretty informative. I'd also add that in Colorado they don't even sell 93 octane gas because of the air density altitude here. The best that is generally available is 91. Sometimes 89 octane is sold as premium and regular gas is 85 octane, with mid-grade being 87. I live at 8700 feet and I guess you lose a lot of compression up here with a naturally aspirated engine.

Thanks for the detailed explaination!!! It makes perfect sense considering the cr of different engines.

I'm lucky in that a Sunoco station is my way to work ... and I get to run the NASCAR Sunoco Ultra 94. Now I sound like Darrell on a Sunday afternoon! Yee Haw!

Bugitty, Bugitty, Bugitty Let's Go Racing!

That's what I run but frankly the only time I have felt a difference in engine performance is with a bottle of 104+ in the tank.