6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH3.4 v 3.6
Leading reported evidence
Use 997s
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
At the top end you have the brand new 997, then below that used 997s, then the later 996s, then earlier 996s, then 993s, then 964s/3.2s etc.
Leading evidence: 'Use 997s' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace are the main ones' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
changes are the main ones, but there were other tweaks (upgraded engine management, chassis, tyre widths etc.) over the years.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm currently looking at cars around 2001 to 2003 mark. Obviously the less I spend the better!!
Now I've driven both the facelift version and older version before but not back to back and not noticed a massive amount of difference. Now I've just had an argument on the phone with a specialist dealer salesman telling me that the 3.4 was an "inferior product" to the 3.6 and significantly slower!!
Is this really the case??
Having had a 3.6 Coupe from new, a second hand 996 cab 3.4 and a from new 3.6 996 cab I would strongly advise you go for the 3.6. It has more torque and a little more power. A much better car. However nobody could call the 3.4 slow , its still a great car.
My current 997 3.6 feels much faster than my previous 3.6 996.
You should enjoy any of the recent 911 variants
The 3.6 'facelift' model incorporated a significant number of improvements over the 3.4 and, having owned both, I would say that the 3.6 is the better car.
However, you get what you pay for. There are plenty of excellent 3.4s for under £40k, whereas most 3.6s will be well north of this figure.
That's the thing - I can afford a 3.6 at £40k to £45k but not sure whether it is worth me spending the extra.
I have been royally spanked on the residuals of my M3 [
] and am keen to not lose so much again (I appreciate that it will lose money - I'm just hoping at a slower rate!!). The 911 is the perfect choice as it is just as swift and will give me a lot more front end feedback (came into the M3 from a Lotus - that was different!!)
Consequently as this is my first foray into 911 ownership do I "settle" for a 3.4 and be happy with it for a couple of years or do I go the extra £10k for a 3.6?? So the question really is "Is the 3.6 £10k better than a 3.4??"
Also is the used market for 911's any different in winter??
The residual issue affects the whole prestige market at the moment. Porsche and BMW owners might complain, but some Ferrari, Maserati and Aston Martin owners have really suffered on a grand scale.
With 911s the prices tend to compress rather than collapse. At the top end you have the brand new 997, then below that used 997s, then the later 996s, then earlier 996s, then 993s, then 964s/3.2s etc. Of course there are exceptions, certain desirable models will buck the trend.
If you are looking for a 996 to use and enjoy regularly, and keep for a while, then it may be worth stretching to a 3.6 'facelift' model and you should now find a better choice close to £40k (what you've lost on the M3 you may have gained on a 996). A private purchase may yield the best deal.
To protect your investment try to ensure:
- As low a mileage as possible
- UK supplied/full OPC hoistory/ideally Porsche Warranty
- As high a spec as possible
Good luuck
Hi JLS22!
Just in case it helps, below are the main differences between pre & facelift models, if you decide to go the facelift route, think about an early sensibly priced (a lot are still over priced so be careful) C4S, if possible, for best residuals!
2002 MY-
New "˜Facelift' model introduced, also the C4S & TARGA models.
The facelift (& new model C4S & Targa) featured a number of improvements, including"¦
1/
A more aggressive looking front and rear-end, with aero-dynamic improvements that greatly reduce lift, along with new (more efficient) clear teardrop shaped front lights (same look as the Turbo) to further distance the 911 from the Boxster.
2/
Porsches "Variocam plus" technology was added to an enlarged 3.6 litre engine. This
gave an additional 20bhp (to 320 bhp) but more importantly, greatly increased the mid
range flexibility of the car. In-gear thrust felt better and more deep chested than before.
3/
The exhaust system was "˜tweaked' to improve the volume and quality of sound
inside and outside the car.
4/
Inside the 996 gained a glove box & twin cup holders, the interior was upgraded to
include soft touch plastics.
5/
The OBC (on board computer) became standard equipment & this was placed centrally below the rev counter, the digital speedometer became smaller and moved (this was a negative step) to the left.
6
/ A "˜smaller' three-spoke "˜sports style' steering wheel became standard equipment.
7
/ The facelift also incorporated improvements to aerodynamics, crash protection, body shell rigidity & benefited from chassis/suspension fine-tuning, to improve stability, handling & ride comfort.
These M.Y. changes are the main ones, but there were other tweaks (upgraded engine management, chassis, tyre widths etc.) over the years.
The above list applies to C2/Cab & C4.
All the best with your search.
Grant
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.