9 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH992.2 Techart - Page 1 - 911/Carrera GT - PistonHeads UK
Leading reported evidence
Run standing mile
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
You should take it up to Elvington and run standing mile with a VBOX if you do go for the piggy back solution.
Leading evidence: 'Run standing mile' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run standing mile' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I won’t be running standing starts but am looking forward to enjoying it on track from time to time.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Anyone on here upgraded their 992.2 using the Techart engine power kit?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
PistonHeads: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T182539Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
Anyone on here upgraded their 992.2 using the Techart engine power kit? Takes HP up by 111 and NM by 80. Love my new T but want a little more punch from the engine.
Thanks I did. One said still developing, the other said it’s technically identical to the 992.1 (which it’s clearly not). I can’t stand BS’ers and ruled them out immediately.
There is more anti tamper protection on the ECU for the gen 2, so they’re not finding it so easy.
Techart avoids the ECU and seems to be a proven installation.
The performance stats claims look astonishing for the power claims. 100-200kph in 6.2 secs and 0-200kph in 9.7 secs very fast for a 505bhp/530nm 911. You should take it up to Elvington and run standing mile with a VBOX if you do go for the piggy back solution. Looks neat and have only heard good things re Tech 9.
IMI A said:
The performance stats claims look astonishing for the power claims. 100-200kph in 6.2 secs and 0-200kph in 9.7 secs very fast for a 505bhp/530nm 911. You should take it up to Elvington and run standing mile with a VBOX if you do go for the piggy back solution. Looks neat and have only heard good things re Tech 9.
I agree, it does sound astonishing, in terms of acceleration improvement. I’ve decided to go for it and have it booked in next week. I won’t be running standing starts but am looking forward to enjoying it on track from time to time.
Jones the cat said:
I stand corrected as the centre console and gear set up in that looks way nicer than OEM.
I’m just installing the power kit, none of their other enhancements. I guess beauty is in the eye of the beholder there. My car doesn’t even have the stock decals on it, nor the H pattern window stickers and I’m even taking the mirror housing back to body colour. It’ll just look like what it is - a Carerra but a manual one.
By the sounds of the turbo and breathing/cooling enhancements made for the 992.2 version, together with the updated brakes, I don’t feel I need to make other mechanical changes. Time will tell…
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
