12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBuying a 996 C2S Cabriolet - Advice
Leading reported evidence
Replace every five years
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I make sure coolant is changed every five years, change gearbox oil every c40k miles and use a 10W-50 synthetic with a bit of zddp in the engine.
Leading evidence: 'Replace every five years' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check any dampness' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The owner agreed, but they do appear in great shape and fluid was replaced last year.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The advantage of the lack of feel is that they perform brilliantly when used 'enthusiastically' and come to life.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
They feel like they are made of cheese when used hard;-)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Give the hood and it’s workings a good check, any dampness on the F & R carpets, steamy windows, corrosion should be zero any?poor accident repair.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi all,
Just thought I'd post a quick request for any advice regards viewing and buying a C2S cab on an 02 plate. I've read the buying guides etc and have a bit of knowledge about porsche in general owning a 1985 944 turbo for the past 15 years. Just though I may get some useful tips about the 2002 generation 996 cab from folk on here. Being 16yrs old, what are the typical areas of wear and tear/corrosion etc.
The car in question has had a replacement engine under warranty in 2007 (at just 20k miles), having covered a further 40k since. Great service history and file (not yet viewed the file). MOT history looks good with no major failure issues over the years.
Doubt the owner is on here as he's only owned it for 2 years (scratching that itch), but if you are, Hello!
Thanks in advance for any tips.
Hi Philip
Good luck in your quest, , no doubt you have read up a lot so you should be aware of most issues. Give the hood and it’s workings a good check, any dampness on the F & R carpets, steamy windows, corrosion should be zero any?poor accident repair. Have good check of front rads, stick your hand in if full of crud suspect there condition, low speed over speed humps listen for creaky suspension, condition of discs. oil leaks around RMS, all areas where you can wheel & deal. if you like it ? getting a independent check.
They are great cars and lot of cabs around this time of year so don’t rush and walk if you’re not smitten.
Good luck & kind Regards
Andy
Our '03 has been fine. Just over 100k miles now and apart from regular service it's had a coffin arm, minor soft top fault and one rad.
Exhaust was a bit rattly a few years ago which took some time as the studs were seized, not too expensive though.
I make sure coolant is changed every five years, change gearbox oil every c40k miles and use a 10W-50 synthetic with a bit of zddp in the engine.
It doesn't like pot holes but so far the council has paid up, had a realignment a couple of years ago.
We've had good service at Autostrasse in Coggeshall.
Still drives well and hasn't been an expensive car to own. It'll be a change after a 951.
Hi Phil,
Good luck with this. If you have any doubts I would certainly get Porsche Inspections to give it a going over. Then you'll have some bargaining power if any potential nasties are pointed out.
Simon
Having seen it today, I went ahead and bought it. Can't wait to pick it up Friday and enjoy the Easter weekend, if only the clouds would break.... Thanks for the advice...
https://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201803254918309?logcode=visc&fromSA=true
Thanks Andy,
Side question following the test drive. It drove superb with no signs of issues with steering, suspension, engine etc, however I did comment that the brakes felt a bit wooden. The owner agreed, but they do appear in great shape and fluid was replaced last year.
Is it normal for a 996 (particularly when not driven hard and warmed up properly) to have 'wooden' feeling brakes? Or is this where my bills start!!
I bought my 996 C4 manual cabriolet four years ago and have enjoyed every day of ownership. Even the day I had to have new switchable sports exhaust boxes fitted.
As for tips:
Always use Shell V-Power petrol.
Ignore anyone who says a cabriolet isn't a proper 911.
Enjoy,
Jerry
I'm very used to all the jibs about 'poor mans porsche', VW, Audi etc etc!
I bought my 944 Turbo nearly 16 years ago now and it was 16 at the time, now I've bought a 996 which is 16, I wonder if I'll own it as long...they'll be stable mates for a long time to come now....
I've always wanted a rag top since my Dad had a Triumph Spitfire for a while when I was a kid. I loved that open top driving. I remember being harassed by some young hooligans in a Cortina one day and my Dad racing them through the back roads in North Wales. Suffice to say we left them for dead!
Yes I would agree that the brakes can and do feel 'wooden' or a little dead at slower speeds ... basically I describe it as 'under assisted'.
The advantage of the lack of feel is that they perform brilliantly when used 'enthusiastically' and come to life. Personally I think they are fantastic brakes and stand up well to hard usage given they are standard road brakes.
Contrast this with my M3 brakes from the same era which are okay at pedestrian speeds and quite assisted, almost overly assisted. They feel like they are made of cheese when used hard;-)
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.