fullymatted.
Back to search
986Forum

NHP Exhaust. What do you think? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
7 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHNHP Exhaust. What do you think? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Leading reported evidence

Run nhp headers

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I'm running NHP headers with high flow cats and NHP midpipes that delete the rear cats.

Original post Read captured discussion
NHP Exhaust. What do you think? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run nhp headers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run nhp headers' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 7 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run nhp headers

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I'm running NHP headers with high flow cats and NHP midpipes that delete the rear cats.

Original post Read captured discussion
NHP Exhaust. What do you think? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

7 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • 986Forum: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T053112Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Does anyone have the NHP exhaust and if so what do you think of it? It looks really good but I cant judge the sound from the video. Also what do you think of the NHP headers?

POST 2Original post

I don't have the exhaust and have never heard it in person, but from what I see online, and what I have read, it sounds like a decent setup for the money. some have said it does NOT drone, some say it does, but I suspect if it does, it is on the low/tolerable side. if I were to get rid of my Pedro exhaust, I think I'd get the NHP system. but $2000 for a entire exhaust is NOT cheap and the reality is, despite what the sites claim, I doubt you'd see much of any power gain from the system. some where claim these exhausts can actually decrease power...but I'll let the "experts" address that. I do thin it sounds cool. FYI - the "coolest" exhaust I have heard, via the internet, is the RUF. I love how this guy's car sounds. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wMrXv1lvYs it's 4 minutes of the owner driving around like a complete moron... but it sounds cool. similar to the NHP I think. go to 2:53.... great sounds! at least to me..

POST 3Original post

Here you go Mr Stud. http://986forum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=21061&page=6&pp=20&highlight=nhp

POST 4Original post

I'm running NHP headers with high flow cats and NHP midpipes that delete the rear cats. I traded my old base boxster muffler for a Boxster S muffler. I love it! It's louder and sounds great when the car warms up without being obnoxiously loud. Almost a year with this setup and zero problem. ZERO REGRETS!

POST 5Original post

That exhaust system is not for the 3.2 boxster S, but rather a 2.7. Notice the absence of the pre-cat.

POST 6Original post

Unfortunately, that Ruf exhaust is part of a 3.4 engine conversion, not a regular boxster. My 9FF exhaust sounds a lot like it.

POST 7Original post

that guys video claims he only has a 2.7L..... ?? maybe he got it separate?

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.