6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWhat are the pifall and issues with a 2001 996
Leading reported evidence
Replace ims
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I had the IMS changed when out, the old one had no signs of wear, but the early ones such as mine had dual row bearings and seem ok, not sure on the 2001.
Leading evidence: 'Replace ims' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace ims' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace ims
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I had the IMS changed when out, the old one had no signs of wear, but the early ones such as mine had dual row bearings and seem ok, not sure on the 2001.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T130754Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have read the article on 996 issues. I am looking at a 2001 C4 tiptronic with 60k miles.
is there anything specific that that this year and spec suffer from?
And the cost to rectify each issue ?
thanks
If you are really concerned, then you may want to get Porsche centre to check the car over and resolve any issues and consider a warranty. I am sure others can confirm if this is possible as the 996 considered a modern classic (certainly the 3.4) and I believe must have strong service history in the first place. This will mean you will have to consider service by an OPC going forward.
This could cost a £££s or you may want to reserve a pot of cash for the unexpected as many do. As an example an engine out/in can cost about £3k on average and that's without extras/parts etc.
I would have a good inspection and service history. These are fabulous cars for the money and as above just drive and enjoy it.
Hi
I bought a Cayman S 6 years ago then panicked with all the scare stories. Bore scoring, IMS RMS usual stuff.
6 years on not a titter from the car recommend to anyone. But then.
I just paid top dollar for a 2002 3.6 996 from Porsche main dealer taking the view start with a good car and backup, no Porsche warranty however (Kept the Cayman)
Knowing all the possible faults I thought this is the best way forward. I was also told the issues often raised are rarer than people would make you think. No help to those that do suffer however.
I now have two ticking time bombs.
What am I saying. Buy the best one you can afford, keep it maintained and enjoy it.
If the worst should happen worry about it then.
That's my plan
Ive had my 996 for nearly two years, and have just got it back from an engine rebuild, cylinder head cracked on 1-3 bank, which seems to be a potential design flaw in the M96 engine, get a leak test done, if all good and you buy one, get a lower temp thermostat fitted and waterless coolant to take the pressure and heat out of the system. I had the IMS changed when out, the old one had no signs of wear, but the early ones such as mine had dual row bearings and seem ok, not sure on the 2001. Cars do go through suspension bushings etc, any squeaks, creaks, sign of worn bushes, however not too expensive to replace. Knowing all of this and the big bill Ive just had, would I change my mind and not purchase one?? Not a chance! The best on road sports car experience you can have at this price! You will always drive with a grin on your face!
