fullymatted.
Back to search
Porsche Club GB

Wow 911 UK Censors Rule

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWow 911 UK Censors Rule

Leading reported evidence

Recommend company, and has no direct link

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

We do have rules on advertising but if a member is simply recommending a company, and has no direct link with them, then we don't have any issues with that.

Original post Read captured discussion
Wow 911 UK Censors Rule
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Recommend company, and has no direct link' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend company, and has no direct link' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 11 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Recommend company, and has no direct link

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

We do have rules on advertising but if a member is simply recommending a company, and has no direct link with them, then we don't have any issues with that.

Original post Read captured discussion
Wow 911 UK Censors Rule
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T172408Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Ok, must be the quickest removal of a post ever! 911 UK had a post regarding Design 911 and their offers, pulled after 3 posts! Not slagging off, just asking questions really The power of advertising! Please do not let this forum be over powering like that, its so painful, I know you need sponsors but please, be as reasonable as you always have been in here........ Thats why I keep coming back!

POST 3Original post

And technically, by this forum's rules, websites shouldn't be in the signature - but that's my blind eye....[ ] We do have rules on advertising but if a member is simply recommending a company, and has no direct link with them, then we don't have any issues with that.

POST 4Original post

Speaking as someone banned from 911UK, it hardly surprises me.

POST 7Original post

I was banned too, for the same reasons Richard was ?? We should set up a poll. Person banned most times wins a prize!

POST 8Original post

Even this forum is sensitive to Club sponsors sometimes. I don't like it, but it's the same everywhere now. Even the most "independent" groups soon learn there is a market out there. :-(

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I understand, its just that on that site, if you're an advertiser you will get away with murder, and the "boss" will recommend you at every possible opportunity. If however you dont advertise and he wont make any money out of you he is quite happy to slag off companies without good proof and just go on internet hearsay!

POST 10Original post

This thread is getting into "naming and shaming" territory.

POST 11 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

[Image-only or quote-only post; no author-written text.]  

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.