10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHUnder tray fixing options
Leading reported evidence
Use their adhesive
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use their adhesive' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace these' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I know I have read before about different options to replace these, but cannot find the details.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Obviously need to drill holes in the body to fit these, I would probably use rivnuts and make my own up if I decided to do that?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
911uk: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello
Looking for some info again please. I was looking to re attach my under trays - but quite a few of the fixing points are starting to rust away. I know I have read before about different options to replace these, but cannot find the details. Any advice on options to do this please? Many thanks.
Some kind folks gave me this link, someone else gave an eBay link to something similar but I can’t find it.
as I understand it you can JB Weld these in place
M5 x 12mm Stainless Steel Thread
M5 x 12mm
www.ecfibreglasssupplies.co.uk
Someone said these are a genuine VAG part?
Obviously need to drill holes in the body to fit these, I would probably use rivnuts and make my own up if I decided to do that?
Hopefully someone’s done the job can give their experience
Brand name is ‘Big Heads’
I’ve seen all sorts of 2 part automotive adhesives incl structural, in repair videos - I’d do some research and see what is available locally at a sensible price. The ones I’ve seen have two separate cartridges where the nozzle mixes the two parts as they’re squeezed through.
There you go, doddle to find on my pc rather than on my phone:
M
Post in thread '2001 C4 project car'
7 Jul 2020
Surfaces prepared for the new studs, these will be held on with JB Weld, given the surface area and the weigth of the tin foil they have to support, I'm sure they will be fine.
MC
MisterCorn
