10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHSuperchips
Leading reported evidence
Check website, have a look here
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check website, have a look here' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check website, have a look here' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Then I went to Revo and they said they couldn't do a 1998 model because Porsche changed the ECU in 1999 and they only have an upgrade for the later version.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I was reading Total 911 last night which was arguing that ECU maps changed so often that you need an individualised map; but they're then quoting 1600 quid.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Also Fifth gear used Superchips to provide the mapping for that farse of a 200mph Lotus Esprit thing they did.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
After I saw the Lotus getting massacered on Wrong Gear - I think they should change their name to Super Chimps.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Then I went to Revo and they said they couldn't do a 1998 model because Porsche changed the ECU in 1999 and they only have an upgrade for the later version.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I was reading Total 911 last night which was arguing that ECU maps changed so often that you need an individualised map; but they're then quoting 1600 quid.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Porsche Club GB: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T213932Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
At the Autosport show yesterday I was asking at the Superchips stand what they do for early 996s. They reckon a 17bhp increase and improved "driveability" (I forget the torque increase quoted).250 quid +VAT.
Then I went to Revo and they said they couldn't do a 1998 model because Porsche changed the ECU in 1999 and they only have an upgrade for the later version.
Has anyone tried the Superchips route, and does anyone know about the 1999 ECU upgrade; not heard of that before?
Mike
The early 996's are Motronic DME version 5.2.2 with mechanical throttle. From MY00 (late 99) they changed to DME 7.2 which has fly-by-wire (eGas) thtottle.
checked the website, have a look here:
http://www.superchips.co.uk/curves/911c4s2002.pdf
its a graph showing projected increase.
Has anyone had this done? Is it actually possible to get this sort of gain by just re-mapping the ecu??
I know good gains are achievable with Turbo cars, but normally aspirated?
dont mean to sound sceptical as i am curious
Superchips has a very bad reputation over on the 944 forum. I don't know the details but you might want to post a question on that forum or do a search to find some related threads. I'm sure they've been linked to the cause of a couple of blown up turbo engines - you might be OK with an N/A engine but it's best to do your homework before tinkering. Also Fifth gear used Superchips to provide the mapping for that farse of a 200mph Lotus Esprit thing they did.
Re-mapped 944 S2 engines can gain somewhere around the 5% to 10% in power generally. The biggest improvement is reported bo be power delivery - and fuel consumption. With the more modern and sophisticated ECU's in the 996 I would think you should expect much better gains.
So it's concerning that superchips seem to have the one upgrade for all 3.4s.
I was reading Total 911 last night which was arguing that ECU maps changed so often that you need an individualised map; but they're then quoting 1600 quid. I'm starting to think this is a solution to a problem that doesn't exist - what difference is 17 bhp going to make.
The way I look at it is that if Superchips can only achieve about 5% extra power (at best) then Porsche have made a pretty good job of fuel mapping on the naturally aspirated 996. Also, 5% gain is probably removing something of the safety margin.
£1600 is a heck of a lot of Driving Instruction.
The first thing to upgrade (and the one that gives the best gain) is always the nut behind the wheel...[
]
After I saw the Lotus getting massacered on Wrong Gear - I think they should change their name to Super Chimps.
The only chips I would buy from them are ones which usually come with a battered haddock.
They could also try:-
Sloppychips
Sillygimps
Slippywhimps
Cheekygits
This is could become a competition - ??
I guess that I should add that the above views are merely my opinion and not factual.
Not necerssarily. Don't forget that most modern day cars are more constrained due to much tighter emissions regulations and achieving sensible fuel economy figures for all the marketting bumf. With the more sophisitcated modern ECU's that can control alot more parameters and more accurate air flow meters I would expect alot more power from chipping a newer car.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.