25 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMetal Grinding Sound on Startup
Leading reported evidence
Replace starter and it seems
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Not one hour ago I replaced the starter and it seems to be all better.
Leading evidence: 'Replace starter and it seems' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check cables and the ground path return' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
It's probably more likely to happen with an infrequently used car since the grease on the splines for the gear can gum up and slow it extending into the flywheel.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My current plan for if it comes back is if it happens a second time, I'll replace the battery, and if it happens a third then I'll look into lubing/replacing the starter.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My current plan for if it comes back is if it happens a second time, I'll replace the battery, and if it happens a third then I'll look into lubing/replacing the starter.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My current plan for if it comes back is if it happens a second time, I'll replace the battery, and if it happens a third then I'll look into lubing/replacing the starter.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm not saying you are wrong, just pointing out that based on the data you have given us, we cannot know a proper load test has been done on the battery.
Test have been input the tester and there's a history/baseline
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You have a smart tester and all of the parameters of the battery under test have been input the tester AND there's a history/baseline for it to compare.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
25 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Relatively easy swap out and problem solved right away.
I just went to take my car out to dinner, and I heard a metallic grinding for a second or two while I had the key turned, and the car didn’t start when I released it. I paused and turned the key with the door open to hear better what it was, and this time I heard the same sound but much quieter and it went away after 1 second and the car started. I turned it off and back on again a third time with no sounds.
I just got back from work so everything was still warm.
Car is a
2008 Cayman S
with 96,000 km (60,000 miles)
If it were my ride, the first thing I would do is determine whether it runs correctly after ignition. If it runs great once it started, then say to yourself thank you God. As for where to go from there? I’d either get it to a shop of course, or I would pull that aluminum rear panel and observe, as I started the car. Maybe it’s just the starter, till then, I would park on inclines in case I needed to clutch start it assuming that it is a manual, but before that you have to determine whether the car runs correctly after ignition.
I took it for a quick 5 min drive and everything sounded normal. No sounds out of the ordinary.
I had a quick chat to a mechanic and they said something about the starter motor, and that it should still be fine to drive. They’re going to take a look at it after the weekend.
Off the cuff,
@TheTheTheTheo
- I'm guessing your starter needs attention. As the sound was right at the start, but not afterwards when you were driving around -- that's exactly when it sounds like when it was making the grinding sound. I'd definitely go grab another battery when you have a chance. Let us know how you get on with this. Cheers.
Both are entirely possible - and unfortunately - the first failure mode can cause the 2nd failure mode (BTDT about 6 decades ago, when I was a poverty driver..)
There is a sliding gear in the starter that engages the flywheel when you spin the starter motor using the key. Depending on the design - that gear is moved by a solenoid (that also makes the electrical connection) or by inertia - with a cleverly engineered curvy set of splines inside the gear and on the motor output shaft. Whatever way it's done - a weak battery can cause #1. If it grinds long enough it can knock or damage some of the teeth on the flywheel. That gets expensive because it leads to #2 - which requires engine out, probably a new clutch and flywheel and starter - I'd guess around $4k USD in total.
So as suggested - perhaps a new battery for $200 USD installed (Firestone in the US carries Interstate, not sure about NZ prices..) might be a wise investment, and hope it doesn't happen again. It's probably more likely to happen with an infrequently used car since the grease on the splines for the gear can gum up and slow it extending into the flywheel. Your car with 96,000km in 16 years is a low-use car.
Assuming battery is good, I would say go ahead and get a starter as it will most likely progress eventually needing a new starter. Mine started this a couple of weeks ago and I put the new starter on today.
I had the same issue after starting the engine. Pulled the starter and lubed the bendix gear and it went away. A month or two later it came back. Not one hour ago I replaced the starter and it seems to be all better.
agree with possible starter issue. the 987's tend to need a replacement at about the 10-12 year cycle. mine occasionally refused to start/turnover when key turned and gradually got worse.
I had a very similar issue and it was a dying starter. You can get a great Bosch unit replacement on
Amazon
for a great price. Relatively easy swap out and problem solved right away. Cranks better than ever!
Here is the link to the starter I used
BOSCH SR0808N Original Equipment New Starter - Compatible with Select
Porsche 911
,
Boxster
,
Carrera
GT,
Cayman
https://a.co/d/6phtQOm
Once in a great while lubing it results in a long-term fix - but usually not. The cause of the binding is typically wear on the bushing at the flywheel end of the starter "nose" - the starter gear rides in that and there's quite a bit of force exerted on it. Considering the amount of work to R&R one - I'd opt for a Bosch rebuilt one every time. They're usually really new starters (sold as "rebuilt" so they aren't competing with their other vendors - like
Porsche
parts departments - in the US..)
This is the same starter I put on mine. That was the best price O was able to come up with and same experience with best starting I have had on this car that is pretty new to me, three months or so.
I got the battery tested and it was at 86% so likely not an issue relating to the battery. I was advised that I didn't have a very good battery which could have caused it.
My car is used as a daily, so sees multiple startups per day, and the issue hasn't happened again. Hoping it was just a one off.
My current plan for if it comes back is if it happens a second time, I'll replace the battery, and if it happens a third then I'll look into lubing/replacing the starter.
How was the battery tested?
"86%" means nothing when it comes to the health of a battery, particularly an automotive starting battery.
The only way to properly test it is with a load tester such as the one shown here.
Everything starting/running starts (NPI) with the battery. Until that's sorted/known good, you could chase your tail.
The "percentage" showing on most battery "Testers" is just a guess. Unless....
You have a smart tester and all of the parameters of the battery under test have been input the tester AND there's a history/baseline for it to compare.
Thus.... absent the above, IF that unit includes a load testing function, that is more important than any percentage reading.
I'm not saying you are wrong, just pointing out that based on the data you have given us, we cannot know a proper load test has been done on the battery.
Once you have a known good battery, the
next
path is (literally) the current to and from the battery. Check the cables and the ground path return.
All of the above could cause not enough current at the starter.
That said, it still could be mechanical as in the starter not fulling engaging the flywheel for various reasons such as not operating properly due to age/dirty/lack of lube or damage such as gear teeth missing on the starter or flywheel.
You/we need more data.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.