32 captured repliesPartial discussion capture · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPlease help difficult decision
Reported or suspected cause
last model year
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
Which makes sense, as we were still on the back side of the financial crisis, plus it was the last model year for the previous body style that had already run its course.
Leading evidence: 'last model year' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'last model year' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check bore scoring…' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
" saying applies here, 30K is a clean car with plenty left in the tank for the
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Which makes sense, as we were still on the back side of the financial crisis, plus it was the last model year for the previous body style that had already run its course.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Which makes sense, as we were still on the back side of the financial crisis, plus it was the last model year for the previous body style that had already run its course.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
last model year
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
Which makes sense, as we were still on the back side of the financial crisis, plus it was the last model year for the previous body style that had already run its course.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
32 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Planet-9: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 1 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm in my twilight of life and I am going to purchase my first
Porsche
. The vehicles I was looking to purchase 2015-2017
Cayman
, However I noticed the other day the older gentleman, Has a 2001
911
C4S for sale locally with 31,000 miles in immaculate condition. So I went to take it for a ride it's wonderful the price I believe is right low 30's, I am aware of the
IMS
issue he says it was never done but all other basic service was, Car sounded and drove fanatic still tight. It doesn't obviously have the modern creature comforts I was hoping for bluetooth, camera etc. but what a ride now I don't know what to do spend the 20k more for a new
cayman
or save 20k and have this.
The standard advice has always been to buy the newest
Porsche
you can afford. This is a little different. In my mind the only advantage the
911
has is that it is perceived to be the more prestigious model and so if you care what others think then the
911
might have some appeal. In all other measures, the
Cayman
is the better car. However, factor in the bias of this
Cayman
heavy form.
Agreed, it cost the same amount of money for basic maintenance on an older P car car as it does a newer one, however the older models are at that point that things will start to fail that you won't necessarily have to worry about quite yet on a newer model. No problem if you are OK with that and get a good enough deal that there is enough cash reserves from the cheaper car to cover those cost.
As you stated, this is a 996 model that has the crappy
IMS bearing
, so the lower mileage on this car is actually a negative thing. The
IMS
bearings would typically fail early in the cars life once enough miles were on the car, so a 996 with higher mileage is less likely to have an
IMS
failure than one that hasnt been driven enough yet to know if there will be an issue with the
IMS
yet.
There is an old saying that really holds true with these cars, "the most expensive
Porsche
you own will be the cheapest
Porsche
you buy"
A test ride proves that at the moment the much-feared
IMS
is performing correctly. You stated you would save 20K, why not price out the cost of the
IMS
upgrade and negotiate? This is if you have a passion for this
911
. The savings is substantial and those models kept nice will do fine going forward, especially with an
IMS
upgrade. Lastly, I don't think the "cheaper
Porsche
" saying applies here, 30K is a clean car with plenty left in the tank for the
next
owner, even from the photo you can see it's been loved. The real question is do you like that
911
and only you can answer that.
The only reason I considered it was that it is so clean and it drove so nice, I was told the same as the first responder to my post when buying a
porsche
always buy the latest year model you can afford. I'm sure he'll take 30k for it he mentioned splitting the difference for the cost of the
IMS
but I think I'm gonna pass and continue my search for a 2016-17
Cayman
or possibly
Boxster
. thanks to all the responded.
Exactly what I was thinking that's why I am passing the lower the milage = higher risk of
IMS
failure he was soft on the car you can tell better to ride it like a
porsche
What is "Twilight"?
Have you rolled in and out fo a
Cayman
?
1) Drive both and see what you like better (at near equal prices)
2) Set your budget
3) Get the nicest best maintained care at your budget based on what you like.
I would not buy new, let some other person pay for the initial depreciation.
I would definitely pass on the 996 and try and get a well-loved
981s
Boxster
or
Cayman
. Mid-engine, more of the modern options you want. They have that model year pretty well sorted out. Please don't get me wrong the
911
is a great car, I am just biased and love my
Boxster S
. You couldn't tell me with the top down on the way to work I should be in an older
911
scheduling the
IMS
solution install. It's nice that you are able to have a "First World" decision to make in your life. Good luck in your decision no matter which way you go. Let all of us know when you've made it.
i guess there is no wrong or right answer.... only what is right for you....
having said that, taking care of a 22 year old car is different from say a 3-4 year old car.
and you didn't mention what you had in mind.... e.g. if you were planning on taking it for long road trips or if you were planning some track time/autocross... and if this is your only car or daily - all of which might influence the type of car and age range. (car not person 😅 )
Well I love 996’s and I actually like the fact that you can change the
IMS
… I’d check for bore scoring… change the
IMS
RMS and clutch… great car
Personally I’d get the 996.
Cayman
is a great car tho …. Just get what you want.. at the end of the day the
cayman
would be a faster car.. Good luck!
Like many here - I loved the look of the
Cayman
the first time I saw it. There are a few 922's I would love to have - but like most, a 2014-
2016 Cayman
, especially an S or
GTS
are quite simply a better car in many ways. You are going to spend the money one way or another.... spend it on a
Cayman
. If just love
911
's then go for it. Make yourself happy.
But the newer
Cayman
. I bought a
2014 Cayman Base
5 years ago, my friend bought at 1999
Carrera
at the same time. I paid $40k and he paid $25 k. He and I both agree that I have the better and more fun to drive car🏎
When you say you are looking for a 16-17 remember they are very different 2016 was the final year that all Cay mans were 6 cylinder. Everything except the 4.0 is now a turbo 4 cylinder.
That's good advice for a new buyer.
I love my
987.1
C-S. I was going to trade up to a .2 but I enjoy the car so much I think I'll just keep it and pick up a
Boxster S
.2.
you mentioned a 996 but what about a 997? The .2 also enjoys a strengthened engine.
what about a
981
or a 991? The old engine issues are resolved. I would go there but I want the hydraulic steering.
The 996 C4S is one of the "It" cars these days. I'd be very tempted to go that route. Important to have a quality [not inexpensive] PPI done by a good shop that knows the cars. Buy it, take care of it, and I suspect you will end up with a classic. Either way have fun and good luck.
Ya they are an it car… they just look so good from any angle (turbo body). I’d prefer to find a bad motor model for cheap or a nice runner and sell the motor. I’m not keeping the motor anyway.. 4.5 would be the plan.. imagine 550hp plus in a 996? Fun!! I love 996’s.. 997’s too of course 😁
For what it's worth,
Porsche
made far less
981s
than any other model for the years it was available I believe. I may just be kidding myself to think that my 2014
981
Base will become more collectible than a
911
, and that's not the reason I bought one, but it is nice to have one of the few
981s
in a town full of every other type of
Porsche
.
Yep, 2009-2012
Caymans
were sold in the US in low numbers due to the financial crisis. I had one, and didn't realize just how rare that car was until after it was gone. I want to say that there were only 1,300 or so a year in the US during the crisis with it peaking in 2012 with the lowest value of only 400 or so
Caymans
sold in the US that year. Which makes sense, as we were still on the back side of the financial crisis, plus it was the last model year for the previous body style that had already run its course.
The
981s
are much more plentiful, and are not rare at all other than some of the
GTS
and GT models. They sold more than 23,000
981
Caymans
and Boxsters worldwide in 2014
I just looked up the charts, and it was precisely 462
Caymans
sold in the US for MY 2012
Compared to 3,300-3,600 per year sold for the
981
, which is still low volume compared to the likes of
Chevy
and others, considering they sold 2 million cars in the US in 2022, but still high enough production that they aren't really considered "rare".
Cayman
- prettier, more capable, 2014-2016 = previous years
911
Carrera
motor, brakes etc.
Models, years, options not withstanding,,,, newer (pre
718
)
Cayman
takes it, in general.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.